Saffy N.O. and Others v Minister of Public Works and Others (1227/2018) [2019] ZANCHC 46 (30 August 2019)
The court found that the Department's decision to settle the dispute and pay R10 million to the applicants was irrational and unlawful, as it was made without proper consideration of material facts, including prescription and correct citation of the executive authority. The settlement agreement was declared null and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] ZANCHC 46
- Parties
- Applicant: Luke Bernard Saffy N.O.; Applicant: Donovan Theodore Majiedt N.O.; Applicant: Shavonne Badenhorst St Clair Cooper N.O.; Applicant: Vista Park Development (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation); Respondent: Minister of Public Works; Respondent: MEC: Northern Cape Provincial Government: Department of Public Works; Respondent: HOD: Northern Cape Provincial Government; Respondent: Joh-Arch Investments (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2019
- Case Number
- 1227/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment on Review and Counter Application
- Outcome
- Application by the applicants dismissed; counter-application by the Department granted.
- Judges
- BM Pakati
- Legal Topics
- Legality Review, Settlement Agreement Enforcement, Public Procurement, Prescription of Claims, Liquidation and Distribution Account, State Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Luke Bernard Saffy N.O.
Applicant
Donovan Theodore Majiedt N.O.
Applicant
Shavonne Badenhorst St Clair Cooper N.O.
Applicant
Vista Park Development (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation)
Applicant
Minister of Public Works
Respondent
MEC: Northern Cape Provincial Government: Department of Public Works
Respondent
HOD: Northern Cape Provincial Government
Respondent
Joh-Arch Investments (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment on Review and Counter Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision taken by the Department on 12 September 2017 to settle the dispute with the applicants was lawful and rational.
- 2 Whether the settlement agreement concluded on 27 September 2017 is valid and enforceable.
- 3 Whether the applicants and third party are liable to repay the R10 million paid under the purported settlement agreement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Department's decision to settle the dispute and pay R10 million to the applicants was irrational and unlawful, as it was made without proper consideration of material facts, including prescription and correct citation of the executive authority. The settlement agreement was declared null and void ab initio, as the applicants had not properly accepted it and consensus was lacking. The Department was entitled to review its own decision under the principle of legality, and the counter-application for repayment of the R10 million was granted. The applicants and the third party were ordered to repay the R10 million with interest and to pay the costs of the application,...
Court Disposition
Application by the applicants dismissed; counter-application by the Department granted.
Orders
- The decision taken on 12 September 2017 at Port Nolloth to settle the dispute between the applicants and the Department in Case Number 2072 is reviewed and set aside.
- The settlement agreement (Annexure 'AS5') is declared null and void ab initio.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment