SAFPU and Others v Free State Stars Football Club (Pty) Ltd (JA22/2016) [2017] ZALAC 16; (2017) 38 ILJ 1111 (LAC) (21 February 2017)
The Labour Appeal Court found that the Labour Court misdirected itself by unduly limiting the factors relevant to the exercise of its discretion and failing to appreciate the exceptional circumstances present. The dispute resolution mechanism under the NSL constitution imposed significant financial burdens on the employees, including high referral and appeal fees, which were not present in the Labour Court. The contracts were contracts of adhesion, and the dispute involved retrenchment of fixed-term employees, a matter for which the Labour Court was more suitable. The combination of these factors constituted exceptional circumstances justifying interference with the Labour Court's...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALAC 16
- Parties
- Appellant: SAFPU; Appellant: HU Toromba; Appellant: LM Malek; Appellant: BS Senokoane; Respondent: Free State Stars Football Club (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2017
- Case Number
- JA22/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Staying Proceedings and Directing Referral to Contractual Dispute Resolution Forum.
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. The Labour Court's order staying proceedings and directing referral to the Dispute Resolution Chamber is set aside.
- Judges
- Landman, Savage, Phatshoane
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Term Contracts, Arbitration Agreements, Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Exceptional Circumstances, Unfair Dismissal, Costs of Dispute Resolution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAFPU
Appellant
HU Toromba
Appellant
LM Malek
Appellant
BS Senokoane
Appellant
Free State Stars Football Club (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Staying Proceedings and Directing Referral to Contractual Dispute Resolution Forum.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court correctly exercised its discretion in staying proceedings and directing referral to the Dispute Resolution Chamber under the employment contracts.
- 2 Whether exceptional circumstances existed to justify the Labour Court retaining jurisdiction over the dispute despite the contractual arbitration clause.
- 3 Whether the dispute resolution mechanism under the NSL constitution and rules was unduly onerous or prejudicial to the employees.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court found that the Labour Court misdirected itself by unduly limiting the factors relevant to the exercise of its discretion and failing to appreciate the exceptional circumstances present. The dispute resolution mechanism under the NSL constitution imposed significant financial burdens on the employees, including high referral and appeal fees, which were not present in the Labour Court. The contracts were contracts of adhesion, and the dispute involved retrenchment of fixed-term employees, a matter for which the Labour Court was more suitable. The combination of these factors constituted exceptional circumstances justifying interference with the Labour Court's...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. The Labour Court's order staying proceedings and directing referral to the Dispute Resolution Chamber is set aside.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Paragraph 1 of the order of the court a quo dated 24 November 2015 is set aside and replaced with: 'The point in limine is dismissed. The parties are to enrol the matter for trial after holding a pre-trial conference.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment