Salvation Army (South African Territory) v Minister of Labour (J 464/02) [2004] ZALC 64; (2005) 26 ILJ 126 (LC); [2004] 12 BLLR 1264 (LC) (2 September 2004)
The court found that the applicant does not enter into contracts of employment with its officers, who are ordained ministers serving in response to a spiritual calling. The officers sign undertakings expressly excluding any employment relationship, and the relationship is governed by religious conscience and spiritual covenant, not by employment contract. The officers receive living allowances, not remuneration for services rendered, and there is no intention by either party to create an employment relationship. The court held that the officers are not employees as defined in the Labour Relations Act and related statutes, and those Acts do not apply to them. The applicant established...
- Citation
- [2004] ZALC 64
- Parties
- Applicant: The Salvation Army (South African Territory); Respondent: The Minister of Labour
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 September 2004
- Case Number
- J 464/02
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory order granted in favour of the applicant.
- Judges
- Maya
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Employee, Minister of Religion, Applicability of Labour Legislation, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Salvation Army (South African Territory)
Applicant
The Minister of Labour
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the officers of the Salvation Army are employees as defined in the Labour Relations Act and related labour statutes.
- 2 Whether the relevant labour legislation applies to the officers of the Salvation Army.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant does not enter into contracts of employment with its officers, who are ordained ministers serving in response to a spiritual calling. The officers sign undertakings expressly excluding any employment relationship, and the relationship is governed by religious conscience and spiritual covenant, not by employment contract. The officers receive living allowances, not remuneration for services rendered, and there is no intention by either party to create an employment relationship. The court held that the officers are not employees as defined in the Labour Relations Act and related statutes, and those Acts do not apply to them. The applicant established...
Court Disposition
Declaratory order granted in favour of the applicant.
Orders
- The officers of the applicant are declared not to be employees as defined in the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995; The Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997; The Employment Equity Act, 5 of 1998; The Unemployment Insurance Act, 30 of 1966; The Skills and Development Act, 97 of 1998; The Compensation for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment