Samuels and Others v Juries (Born Samuels) and Others (2508/2022) [2023] ZAWCHC 191 (28 July 2023)
The court held that while section 2(3) of the Wills Act allows for condonation of non-compliance with formalities, including those relating to signing by mark, the applicants failed to discharge their burden of proving that the deceased intended the candidate will to be his will. The founding papers did not adequately explain how the contents of the candidate will were communicated to the deceased, who was unable to read, write, or speak due to a stroke. There was insufficient evidence regarding the deceased's understanding and agreement with the terms of the candidate will, and material errors and omissions in the applicants' papers undermined their case. The court was not satisfied that...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAWCHC 191
- Parties
- Applicant: Maureen Sylvia Samuels; Applicant: Andre Neil Samuels; Applicant: Brent Samuels; Applicant: Colleen Brown (born Samuels); Respondent: Jolene Juries (born Samuels); Respondent: Michelle Diane Benson (born Samuels); Respondent: The Master of the High Court
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2023
- Case Number
- 2508/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application Under Section 2(3) of the Wills Act for Condonation of Non Compliance With Will Formalities.
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Judges
- K Hofmeyr
- Legal Topics
- Wills Act Section 2 3, Testamentary Intention, Formal Requirements for Wills, Condonation of Non Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maureen Sylvia Samuels
Applicant
Andre Neil Samuels
Applicant
Brent Samuels
Applicant
Colleen Brown (born Samuels)
Applicant
Jolene Juries (born Samuels)
Respondent
Michelle Diane Benson (born Samuels)
Respondent
The Master of the High Court
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application Under Section 2(3) of the Wills Act for Condonation of Non Compliance With Will Formalities.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the document signed by the deceased and the first applicant, but not in compliance with section 2(1) of the Wills Act, can be accepted as a valid will under section 2(3).
- 2 Whether the deceased intended the candidate will to be his will.
- 3 Whether the applicants discharged their burden of placing all relevant facts before the court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while section 2(3) of the Wills Act allows for condonation of non-compliance with formalities, including those relating to signing by mark, the applicants failed to discharge their burden of proving that the deceased intended the candidate will to be his will. The founding papers did not adequately explain how the contents of the candidate will were communicated to the deceased, who was unable to read, write, or speak due to a stroke. There was insufficient evidence regarding the deceased's understanding and agreement with the terms of the candidate will, and material errors and omissions in the applicants' papers undermined their case. The court was not satisfied that...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- All the costs of the applicants and the first respondent are to be paid by the estate on the attorney and client scale.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment