SAMWU and Another v SA Local Government Association and Others (C411/2007) [2010] ZALC 32; (2010) 31 ILJ 2178 (LC) ; [2010] 8 BLLR 882 (LC) (3 March 2010)
The court held that the transfer of primary health care services from municipalities to the Department triggered section 197 of the LRA, resulting in the automatic substitution of the Department as employer for affected employees. This default position could only be varied by a valid agreement under section 197(6) with the unions, who were the exclusive bargaining partners. The Department's attempts to secure agreements directly with individual employees after the transfer were invalid, as the unions' agreement was required. The relief sought for future transfers was refused as hypothetical, and the declaratory relief sought for past transfers was refused on discretionary grounds, as no...
- Citation
- [2010] ZALC 32
- Parties
- Applicant: SAMWU; Applicant: IMATU; Respondent: SA Local Government Association; Respondent: MEC for Health, Western Cape; Respondent: Those municipalities listed in Schedule 'A'; Respondent: Those persons listed in Schedule 'B'
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 March 2010
- Case Number
- C411/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Declaratory Relief
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Section 197 Transfer, Collective Bargaining, Declaratory Relief, Variation of Employment Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAMWU
Applicant
IMATU
Applicant
SA Local Government Association
Respondent
MEC for Health, Western Cape
Respondent
Those municipalities listed in Schedule 'A'
Respondent
Those persons listed in Schedule 'B'
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Declaratory Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether written agreements concluded between individual employees and the Department for transfer of employment are valid without union agreement under section 197(6) of the LRA.
- 2 Whether future transfers of employment must occur under section 197(2) unless a valid section 197(6) agreement is concluded.
- 3 Whether the unions are the exclusive bargaining partners for section 197(6) agreements.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the transfer of primary health care services from municipalities to the Department triggered section 197 of the LRA, resulting in the automatic substitution of the Department as employer for affected employees. This default position could only be varied by a valid agreement under section 197(6) with the unions, who were the exclusive bargaining partners. The Department's attempts to secure agreements directly with individual employees after the transfer were invalid, as the unions' agreement was required. The relief sought for future transfers was refused as hypothetical, and the declaratory relief sought for past transfers was refused on discretionary grounds, as no...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment