SAMWU and Others v Ethekwini Municipality and Others (DA5/13) [2016] ZALAC 47; [2016] 12 BLLR 1208 (LAC); (2017) 38 ILJ 158 (LAC) (2 September 2016)
The Labour Appeal Court held that the employees, acting as shop stewards, deliberately defied a lawful and reasonable instruction from their manager to open the workplace gate, resulting in a significant disruption of operations. The evidence established that the employees took the gate keys from the security guard and refused to comply with the instruction, despite their responsibilities under the collective agreement. The arbitrator's finding of gross insubordination was reasonable and justified dismissal, even considering the employees' long service and clean disciplinary records. The arbitrator did not misdirect herself, and the award was not reviewable under section 145 of the LRA....
- Citation
- [2016] ZALAC 47
- Parties
- Appellant: SAMWU; Appellant: Mkhungo SB; Appellant: Ntaka R; Respondent: Ethekwini Municipality; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Dubazane Nonhlanhla, NO
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 September 2016
- Case Number
- DA5/13
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed, with no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Tlaletsi, Ndlovu, Makgoka
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Gross Insubordination, Shop Steward Obligations, Collective Agreement Interpretation, Disciplinary Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAMWU
Appellant
Mkhungo SB
Appellant
Ntaka R
Appellant
Ethekwini Municipality
Respondent
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Dubazane Nonhlanhla, NO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the employees for gross insubordination was substantively fair.
- 2 Whether the arbitrator's award was reviewable under section 145 of the LRA.
- 3 Whether the arbitrator failed to distinguish between insubordination and gross insubordination.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that the employees, acting as shop stewards, deliberately defied a lawful and reasonable instruction from their manager to open the workplace gate, resulting in a significant disruption of operations. The evidence established that the employees took the gate keys from the security guard and refused to comply with the instruction, despite their responsibilities under the collective agreement. The arbitrator's finding of gross insubordination was reasonable and justified dismissal, even considering the employees' long service and clean disciplinary records. The arbitrator did not misdirect herself, and the award was not reviewable under section 145 of the LRA....
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed, with no order as to costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed, with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment