SAMWU obo Gwejane and Others v City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (J 646/20) [2021] ZALCJHB 467 (8 February 2021)
The Labour Court found that although the Municipality failed to comply with the certified arbitration award, its conduct did not amount to contempt of court because the contempt application had previously been postponed sine die pending the outcome of the review application. Both the Municipality and the applicant believed the review application was still alive, despite it being deemed withdrawn due to failure to prosecute within 12 months. The Court held that the Municipality provided a reasonable explanation for non-compliance, and the applicant was also involved in reconstructing the arbitration records. The Court emphasized its supervisory role in ensuring compliance with arbitration...
- Citation
- [2021] ZALCJHB 467
- Parties
- Applicant: SAMWU obo Gwejane and Others; Respondent: City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Dr Imogen Mashazi
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2021
- Case Number
- J 646/20
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application / Return Date on Rule Nisi; Determination of Contempt and Enforcement of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Application for contempt of court dismissed; coercive order issued to ensure compliance with arbitration award.
- Judges
- Mabaso
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Arbitration Award Enforcement, Review Application, Certification of Award, Civil Contempt, Remedial Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAMWU obo Gwejane and Others
Applicant
City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Dr Imogen Mashazi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Return Date on Rule Nisi; Determination of Contempt and Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents are in contempt of court for failing to comply with a certified arbitration award.
- 2 Whether the review application suspended the operation of the arbitration award.
- 3 Whether the Labour Court should issue coercive orders to ensure compliance with the arbitration award.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court found that although the Municipality failed to comply with the certified arbitration award, its conduct did not amount to contempt of court because the contempt application had previously been postponed sine die pending the outcome of the review application. Both the Municipality and the applicant believed the review application was still alive, despite it being deemed withdrawn due to failure to prosecute within 12 months. The Court held that the Municipality provided a reasonable explanation for non-compliance, and the applicant was also involved in reconstructing the arbitration records. The Court emphasized its supervisory role in ensuring compliance with arbitration...
Court Disposition
Application for contempt of court dismissed; coercive order issued to ensure compliance with arbitration award.
Orders
- The First and Second Respondents are not in contempt of court.
- The Second Respondent, as the First Respondent's accounting officer, is directed to ensure that the arbitration award's terms are complied with within 15 days of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment