SAMWU obo M. Abrahams v City of Cape Town (C 611/07) [2008] ZALC 27; [2008] 7 BLLR 700 (LC) ; (2008) 29 ILJ 1978 (LC) (1 January 2008)

SAMWU obo M. Abrahams v City of Cape Town (C 611/07) [2008] ZALC 27; [2008] 7 BLLR 700 (LC) ; (2008) 29 ILJ 1978 (LC) (1 January 2008)

The Labour Court found that the respondent is contractually bound by the national collective agreement, which forms part of the employees' conditions of service and whose application is peremptory. The respondent's unilateral adoption of an abridged disciplinary procedure, in conflict with the collective agreement, constitutes a breach of its obligations. The court held that exceptional circumstances exist, justifying intervention in the pending disciplinary proceedings, given the seriousness of the allegations and the respondent's disregard for the agreed procedure. The applicant established a clear right to relief, with no satisfactory alternative remedy available. The respondent must...

Citation
[2008] ZALC 27
Parties
Applicant: SAMWU (obo M. Abrahams & 106 others); Respondent: City of Cape Town
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 January 2008
Case Number
C 611/07
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Interdict Application After Initial Urgent Proceedings and Exchange of Affidavits
Outcome
Final interdict granted in favour of the applicant.
Judges
D Potgieter
Legal Topics
Collective Agreements, Disciplinary Procedure, Specific Performance, Interdict, Procedural Fairness
Labour Law Civil Procedure Collective Agreements Disciplinary Procedure Specific Performance Interdict Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SAMWU (obo M. Abrahams & 106 others)

Applicant

City of Cape Town

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Final Interdict Application After Initial Urgent Proceedings and Exchange of Affidavits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is bound to follow the disciplinary procedure set out in the national collective agreement.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent may unilaterally implement an abridged disciplinary procedure contrary to the collective agreement.
  3. 3 Whether exceptional circumstances exist justifying court intervention in pending disciplinary proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Court found that the respondent is contractually bound by the national collective agreement, which forms part of the employees' conditions of service and whose application is peremptory. The respondent's unilateral adoption of an abridged disciplinary procedure, in conflict with the collective agreement, constitutes a breach of its obligations. The court held that exceptional circumstances exist, justifying intervention in the pending disciplinary proceedings, given the seriousness of the allegations and the respondent's disregard for the agreed procedure. The applicant established a clear right to relief, with no satisfactory alternative remedy available. The respondent must...

Court Disposition

Final interdict granted in favour of the applicant.

Orders

  • It is declared that the disciplinary proceedings embarked upon by the respondent in respect of applicant's members are in breach of the collective agreement dated 3 February 2004.
  • The respondent is interdicted and restrained from persisting with the disciplinary proceedings in respect of applicant's members other than in accordance with the collective agreement.