SAMWU obo Makibinyane and Others v SA Local Government Bargaining Council and Others (JR1043/18) [2020] ZALCJHB 140 (11 August 2020)
The court found that the applicants did not perempt their right to review, as they challenged the arbitration award timeously and did not accept payment as full and final settlement. The review application was not defective, as the relevant documents were available and referenced. On the merits, the Commissioner correctly determined that the termination of employment constituted a dismissal, and that the dismissal was procedurally unfair due to the failure to hold a disciplinary hearing and violation of the audi alteram partem rule. However, the Commissioner was justified in finding the dismissal substantively fair, as the applicants' repeated refusal to comply with lawful and reasonable...
- Citation
- [2020] ZALCJHB 140
- Parties
- Applicant: SAMWU obo MP Makibinyane & Others; Respondent: SA Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Suria van Wyk; Respondent: Nala Local Municipality
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2020
- Case Number
- JR1043/18
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Opposed Review Application Under Section 145 of the LRA
- Outcome
- Review application dismissed with costs; arbitration award confirmed.
- Judges
- T Deane
- Legal Topics
- Review of Arbitration Award, Procedural Fairness, Insubordination, Audi Alteram Partem, Repudiation of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAMWU obo MP Makibinyane & Others
Applicant
SA Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Suria van Wyk
Respondent
Nala Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Opposed Review Application Under Section 145 of the LRA
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' dismissal was procedurally and substantively fair.
- 2 Whether the arbitration award was reviewable under section 145 of the LRA.
- 3 Whether the applicants' conduct amounted to peremption of their right to review.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants did not perempt their right to review, as they challenged the arbitration award timeously and did not accept payment as full and final settlement. The review application was not defective, as the relevant documents were available and referenced. On the merits, the Commissioner correctly determined that the termination of employment constituted a dismissal, and that the dismissal was procedurally unfair due to the failure to hold a disciplinary hearing and violation of the audi alteram partem rule. However, the Commissioner was justified in finding the dismissal substantively fair, as the applicants' repeated refusal to comply with lawful and reasonable...
Court Disposition
Review application dismissed with costs; arbitration award confirmed.
Orders
- The review application is dismissed with costs.
- The order of the Commissioner is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment