SAMWU obo Mogorosi and Others v South African Local Government Bargaining Council and Others (Jr1528/2020) [2025] ZALCJHB 26 (24 January 2025)
The Labour Court determined that the correct date of dismissal for the applicants was 27 June 2019, when they were informed by the third respondent that their two-year fixed term contracts would not be renewed and were offered a less favourable three-month contract. The referral of the unfair dismissal dispute to the Bargaining Council was made more than four months after this date, without any application for condonation. As a result, the Council lacked jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute, and the commissioner exceeded his powers by proceeding with arbitration. The arbitration award was therefore reviewed and set aside.
- Citation
- [2025] ZALCJHB 26
- Parties
- Applicant: SAMWU obo C Mogorosi and 15 Others; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Tiyani Makhubela N.O.; Respondent: Rand West City Municipality
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2025
- Case Number
- Jr1528/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review Application
- Outcome
- The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside due to lack of jurisdiction; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Molotsi
- Legal Topics
- Late Referral, Jurisdiction of Bargaining Council, Fixed Term Contracts, Condonation, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAMWU obo C Mogorosi and 15 Others
Applicant
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Tiyani Makhubela N.O.
Respondent
Rand West City Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the South African Local Government Bargaining Council had jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute given the late referral.
- 2 What is the correct date of dismissal for purposes of section 190 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 3 Whether the arbitration award should be reviewed and set aside due to lack of jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court determined that the correct date of dismissal for the applicants was 27 June 2019, when they were informed by the third respondent that their two-year fixed term contracts would not be renewed and were offered a less favourable three-month contract. The referral of the unfair dismissal dispute to the Bargaining Council was made more than four months after this date, without any application for condonation. As a result, the Council lacked jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute, and the commissioner exceeded his powers by proceeding with arbitration. The arbitration award was therefore reviewed and set aside.
Court Disposition
The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside due to lack of jurisdiction; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The arbitration award issued by the second respondent dated 7 September 2020 under case number GPD111904 is reviewed and set aside.
- The first respondent did not have jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute as the referral was made late.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment