Sandvik Aktiebolag plc v DSI Underground Holdings S.a.r.l (LM003Apr21) [2021] ZACT 44 (7 June 2021)
- Citation
- [2021] ZACT 44
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, AW Wessels, I Valodia
- Case number
- LM003Apr21
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, AW Wessels, I Valodia
- Case number
- LM003Apr21
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the merger between Sandvik and DSI would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market, as the combined market share increase was negligible. The Tribunal also considered public interest factors, particularly employment, and imposed a condition prohibiting merger-related retrenchments for 24 months post-implementation. The merging parties agreed to these conditions. The merger was approved subject to these employment protections and compliance monitoring requirements.
Court disposition
Merger conditionally approved subject to employment-related conditions.
Orders
- The merger between Sandvik Aktiebolag plc and DSI Underground Holdings S.à.r.l. is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.
- No merger-related retrenchments may be implemented in South Africa for a period of 24 months from the implementation date.
- A Merger Clearance Certificate shall be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal rule 35(5)(a).
- The merging parties must circulate the conditions to employees, trade unions, and representatives within 5 days of approval.
- Compliance affidavits must be submitted to the Competition Commission annually during the moratorium and subsequent preference period.
- Any breach of conditions will be dealt with in terms of the Tribunal and Commission rules.
02
Material facts
Parties
Sandvik Aktiebolag plc
Applicant Counsel: M WagenerDSI Underground Holdings S.à.r.l.
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Large Merger / Merger Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether the merger would negatively impact employment and other public interest considerations under section 12A(3) of the Competition Act.
- 03
Whether merger-related retrenchments should be prohibited for a specified period post-merger.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Sandvik argued that the merger would not result in any substantial lessening of competition, as the horizontal overlap in the market for hard rock bolts was minimal, with the merged entity's accretion below 2%. The parties agreed to employment conditions proposed by the DTIC, including a moratorium on merger-related retrenchments for 24 months post-implementation.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission found no significant competition concerns due to the limited market overlap. The DTIC raised concerns about job security, requesting a condition prohibiting merger-related retrenchments for 24 months. The merging parties accepted this condition and committed to compliance.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, section 12A
A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition, unless justified by technological, efficiency or other pro-competitive gains.
- 02
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, section 12A(3)
Public interest considerations, including the effect on employment, must be assessed in merger proceedings.
- 03
Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995
Retrenchments directly resulting from a merger may be prohibited for a specified period as a condition of approval.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the merger between Sandvik and DSI would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market, as the combined market share increase was negligible. The Tribunal also considered public interest factors, particularly employment, and imposed a condition prohibiting merger-related retrenchments for 24 months post-implementation. The merging parties agreed to these conditions. The merger was approved subject to these employment protections and compliance monitoring requirements.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that retrenchments for reasons unrelated to the merger, such as voluntary separation or operational requirements, are not prohibited by the imposed conditions.
- Preference for re-employment of affected employees for 24 months after the moratorium period reflects a commitment to mitigate adverse employment effects.
- The Tribunal highlighted the importance of monitoring compliance with merger conditions to safeguard public interest objectives.
Court disposition
Merger conditionally approved subject to employment-related conditions.
- The merger between Sandvik Aktiebolag plc and DSI Underground Holdings S.à.r.l. is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.
- No merger-related retrenchments may be implemented in South Africa for a period of 24 months from the implementation date.
- A Merger Clearance Certificate shall be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal rule 35(5)(a).
- The merging parties must circulate the conditions to employees, trade unions, and representatives within 5 days of approval.
- Compliance affidavits must be submitted to the Competition Commission annually during the moratorium and subsequent preference period.
- Any breach of conditions will be dealt with in terms of the Tribunal and Commission rules.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Order
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No.: LM003Apr21
In the matter between:
Sandvik Aktiebolag plc Primary Acquiring Firm
And
DSI Underground Holdings S.à.r.l. Primary Target Firms
Panel
Y Carrim (Presiding Member)
AW Wessels (Tribunal Panel Member)
I Valodia (Tribunal Panel Member)
Heard on
: 07 June 2021
Decided on
: 07 June 2021
ORDER
Further to the recommendations of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 (“the Act”) the Competition Tribunal orders that –
1. the merger between the abovementioned parties be approved in terms of section 16(2)(b) of the Act subject to the conditions attached hereto; and
2. a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal rule 35(5)(a).
Presiding Member Date:
07 June 2021
Ms Yasmin Carrim
Concurring: Mr Andreas Wessels and Prof. Imraan Valodia
Case no: LM003Apr21
Sandvik Aktiebolag plc (Primary Acquiring Firm)
and
DSI Underground Holdings S.à.r.l. (Primary Target Firm)
REASONS FOR DECISION
[1] On 7 June 2021, the Competition Tribunal conditionally approved a large merger between Sandvik Aktiebolag plc (“Sandvik”) and DSI Underground Holdings S.à.r.l. (“DSI”).
[2] The transaction involves Sandvik, a global engineering group, acquiring 100% of the shareholding in DSI, a mining and tunnelling products provider. Sandvik will also acquire 100% of the shares in a South African joint venture between DSI and Frank Calandra Inc (“Jennmar JV”). Post-merger, Sandvik will solely control DSI as well as the Jennmar JV.
[3] Sandvik is a publicly listed Swedish company and is not controlled by any shareholder. Sandvik controls several firms in South Africa.[1]1 DSI is a company incorporated in Luxembourg. In South Africa, Sandvik is predominantly active in the provision of mining and rock
solutions, as well as manufacturing and machining solutions. In South Africa, DSI, through its subsidiaries,2 manufactures and supplies specialised ground control products to the South African underground mining and geotechnical industries.
[4] The Competition Commission considered the activities of the merging parties and found a horizontal overlap in the market for the provision of hard rock bolts in South Africa. However, the merged entity’s accretion would be below 2%, and therefore raised no competition concerns.
[5] The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (“DTIC”) raised employment concerns regarding the fact that the merging parties had not made an absolute commitment to protect jobs. The DTIC requested the implementation of a condition for approval, that no merger related retrenchments should be implemented in South Africa after the merger’s approval for a period of 24 months. The merging parties agreed to the condition.
[6] We concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on any other aspect of the public interest contemplated in section 12A(3). The transaction was accordingly
approved on the basis of the conditions attached hereto as Annexure A.
Signed by:Yasmin Tayob Carrim Signed at:2021-06-07 13:00:48 +02:00
Reason:I approve this document
Ms Yasmin Carrim
Date: 7 June 2021
Mr Andreas Wessels and Prof Imraan Valodia concurring
Tribunal Case Manager: P Kumbirai
For the Merging Parties: M Wagener of Norton Rose Fulbright
For the Commission: R
Maphwanya and B Makgabo
ANNEXURE A
CONDITIONS
1.
DEFINITIONS
The following expressions shall bear the meaning assigned to them below and cognate expressions bear corresponding meaning: –
1.1. “Acquiring Firm” means Sandvik Aktiebolag Plc;
1.2. “Acquiring Group” means the Sandvik Group;
1.3. “Affected Employees” means any employees of the Merging Parties in South Africa that may be retrenched as a result of the Merger after the Moratorium period;
1.4. “Approval Date” means the date referred to on the Competition Tribunal’s merger Clearance Certificate;
1.5. “Commission” means the Competition Commission of South Africa;
1.6. “Competition Act" means the Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended;
1.7. “Conditions” means the conditions set out herein;
1.8. “Days” means any calendar day which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or an official public holiday in South Africa;
1.9. “Employees” means all employees of the Merging Parties in South Africa;
1.10. “Implementation Date” means the date, occurring after the Approval Date, on which the Merger is implemented by the Merging Parties;
1.11. “LRA” means the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, as amended;
1.12. “Merger” means the acquisition of control by the Acquiring Firm over the Target Firm;
1.13. “Merging Parties” means the Acquiring Firm and the Target Firm;
1.14. “Moratorium Period” means the period between the Approval Date and the Implementation Date, and thereafter, a period of 2 years from the Implementation Date;
1.15. “Sandvik Group” means Sandvik Aktiebolag Plc and all firms which it directly and indirectly controls;
1.16. “Target Firm” means DSI Underground Holdings S.à.r.l.; and
1.17. “Tribunal” means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa.
2.
EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS
2.1. The Merging Parties shall not retrench any Employees in South Africa as a result of the Merger for the Moratorium Period.
2.2. For the sake of clarity, retrenchments for purposes of clause 2.1 above will not include
(i) voluntary separation arrangements; (ii) voluntary early retirement packages; (iii) unreasonable refusals to be redeployed in accordance with the provisions of the LRA;
(iv) resignations or retirements in the ordinary course of business; (v) retrenchments lawfully effected for operational requirements unrelated to the Merger; and/or
(vi) terminations in the ordinary course of business, including but not limited to, dismissals as a result of misconduct or poor performance.
2.3. Should the need to retrench Employees arise after the Moratorium Period, the Merging Parties shall for a further period of 24 (twenty-four) months give preference to any Affected Employees in relation to any available vacancies that may arise within any wholly owned subsidiaries and/or divisions that are operationally under the control of the Merging Parties provided they have the requisite qualifications, skills, know-how and experience.
3.
MONITORING OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS
3.1. The Acquiring Firm shall inform the Commission in writing of the Implementation Date of the Merger within 5 (five) Days of it becoming effective.
3.2. The Merging Parties shall each circulate a copy of the Conditions to their Employees in South Africa, the relevant trade unions, if applicable, and employee representatives within 5 (five) Days of the Approval Date.
3.3. As proof of compliance thereof, a Senior Official of the Acquiring Firm, on behalf of the merged entity, shall within 10 (ten) Days of circulating the Conditions, submit an affidavit to the Commission attesting to the circulation of the Conditions and provide a copy of the notice that was sent to the employees, the relevant trade unions,
if applicable and employee representatives.
3.4. Any Employee, relevant trade union or employee representative of either of the Merging Parties who believes that the Merging Parties have not complied with or have acted in breach of these Conditions may approach the Commission.
3.5. The Merging Parties shall, on each anniversary of the Implementation Date, during the Moratorium Period submit an affidavit to the Commission confirming compliance with the conditions for the duration of the Moratorium Period.
3.6. The Merging Parties shall, on each anniversary of the Implementation Date, during the 24-month period following the Moratorium Period submit an affidavit to the Commission confirming compliance with clause 2.3 of the Conditions.
4. BREACH
4.1. In the event that the Commission determines that there has been an apparent breach by the Merging Parties of any of the above Conditions, this shall be dealt with in terms of Rule 39 of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Commission read together with Rule 37 of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Tribunal.
5. VARIATION
5.1. The Merging Parties and/or the Commission may at any time, on good cause shown, apply to the Tribunal for the Conditions to be lifted, revised, or amended.
6. GENERAL
6.1.
All correspondence in relation to the Conditions must be submitted to the following e- mail addresses: mergerconditions@compcom.co.za and ministry@thedtic.gov.za.
[1] Sandvik Holdings Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd, Sandvik (Pty) Ltd, Seco Tools South Africa, Sandvik Financial Services (Pty) Ltd, South Africa Newtrax (Pty) Ltd and Sandvik Mining and Construction Delmas (Pty) Ltd. 2 Rocbolt Technologies Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Rocbolt Technologies Africa (Pty) Ltd and RB Technology Holdings Pty. These firms are controlled by the Jennmar JV.
[1] Sandvik Holdings Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd, Sandvik (Pty) Ltd, Seco Tools South Africa, Sandvik Financial Services (Pty) Ltd, South Africa Newtrax (Pty) Ltd and Sandvik Mining and Construction Delmas (Pty) Ltd.
2 Rocbolt Technologies Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Rocbolt Technologies Africa (Pty) Ltd and RB Technology Holdings Pty. These firms are controlled by the Jennmar JV.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.