Sangoni v Tshemese (CA&R21/18) [2018] ZAECMHC 53 (21 August 2018)

Sangoni v Tshemese (CA&R21/18) [2018] ZAECMHC 53 (21 August 2018)

The court found that the appellant failed to establish locus standi or legal authority over the respondent's allotment. The respondent was deemed an occupier under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, with a certificate of tenure issued by the Transkei Government. There was an established practice of home burials in the locality, and the respondent's cultural and religious rights to bury his daughter at home were protected under both the Tenure Act and the Constitution. The appellant did not demonstrate a clear right, irreparable harm, or absence of alternative remedies required for a final interdict. The appeal was dismissed, and the respondent's burial of his daughter was found to...

Citation
[2018] ZAECMHC 53
Parties
Appellant: Ntsikelelo Zwelihle Sangoni; Respondent: Nkosinathi Tshemese
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 August 2018
Case Number
CA&R21/18
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Decision on Urgent Application for Interdict
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
J D Huisamen, R E Griffiths
Legal Topics
Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Customary Land Rights, Burial Rights, Interdict Requirements, Locus Standi, Bill of Rights Cultural Rights
Land and Property Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Extension of Security of Tenure Act Customary Land Rights Burial Rights Interdict Requirements Locus Standi +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ntsikelelo Zwelihle Sangoni

Appellant

Nkosinathi Tshemese

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Decision on Urgent Application for Interdict

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant had locus standi and legal authority to prevent the respondent from burying his daughter on his allotment.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's right to bury his daughter at home was protected under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act and the Constitution.
  3. 3 Whether the requirements for a final interdict were met by the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant failed to establish locus standi or legal authority over the respondent's allotment. The respondent was deemed an occupier under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, with a certificate of tenure issued by the Transkei Government. There was an established practice of home burials in the locality, and the respondent's cultural and religious rights to bury his daughter at home were protected under both the Tenure Act and the Constitution. The appellant did not demonstrate a clear right, irreparable harm, or absence of alternative remedies required for a final interdict. The appeal was dismissed, and the respondent's burial of his daughter was found to...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.
  • No further legal impediment to the burial exists.