Sanlam Life Insurance Limited v ACT Healthcare Assets (Pty) Ltd (LM065Jul15) [2015] ZACT 113 (15 September 2015)
- Citation
- [2015] ZACT 113
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Andreas Wessels, lmraan I Valodia, Medi Mokuena
- Case number
- LM065Jul15
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Andreas Wessels, lmraan I Valodia, Medi Mokuena
- Case number
- LM065Jul15
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would result in only a minimal increase in market share in both the medical scheme administration and managed healthcare services markets, with accretions of approximately [0-1]% in each. The merging parties would continue to face significant competition from established market participants such as Discovery Limited and MMI Holdings Limited. Customers contacted during the Commission's investigation did not express concerns, indicating the availability of alternatives. No negative impact on employment was anticipated, and no other public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or raise public interest issues, and approved the transaction unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction between Sanlam Life Insurance Limited and ACT Healthcare Assets (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Sanlam Life Insurance Limited
Applicant Counsel: Kesiah Frank of Glyn MaraisACT Healthcare Assets (Pty) Ltd
Respondent Counsel: Anton Roets of Nortons IncAmounts and remedies
- Subscription Price for Shares: ZAR 703,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Approval / Final Determination
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger between Sanlam Life Insurance Limited and ACT Healthcare Assets (Pty) Ltd is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets.
- 02
Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including employment impacts.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Sanlam Life argued that the healthcare sector presents growth opportunities and that it currently lacks sufficient scale in this sector compared to its other retail offerings. The merger would enable Sanlam Life to extend medical scheme offerings to its clients and leverage ACT's expertise.
- Respondent
- ACT submitted that the transaction would provide Medscheme, a subsidiary, with access to Sanlam's extensive distribution capabilities, thereby enhancing its market reach and competitiveness.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended
A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, unless the parties can show technological, efficiency, or other pro-competitive gains.
- 02
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 12A
Public interest considerations, including employment effects, must be assessed in merger proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would result in only a minimal increase in market share in both the medical scheme administration and managed healthcare services markets, with accretions of approximately [0-1]% in each. The merging parties would continue to face significant competition from established market participants such as Discovery Limited and MMI Holdings Limited. Customers contacted during the Commission's investigation did not express concerns, indicating the availability of alternatives. No negative impact on employment was anticipated, and no other public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or raise public interest issues, and approved the transaction unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that minority protections acquired by Sanlam Life confer control for purposes of section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act.
- The merging parties confirmed that no retrenchments are envisaged as a result of the transaction.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
- The proposed transaction between Sanlam Life Insurance Limited and ACT Healthcare Assets (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM065Jul15
In the matter between:
Sanlam Life Insurance Limited Primary Acquiring Firm
and
ACT Healthcare Assets (Pty) Ltd Primary Target Firm
Panel
: Mr Andreas Wessels (Presiding Member)
: Prof lmraan I Valodia (Tribunal Member)
: Ms Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Heard on
: 02 September 2015
Order Issued on
: 02 September 2015
Reasons Issued on : 15 September 2015
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 02 September 2015, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") unconditionally
approved the merger between Sanlam Life Insurance Limited ("Sanlam Life") and ACT Healthcare Assets (Ply) Ltd ("ACT").
[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.
Parties to proposed transaction
Primary acquiring firm
[3] The primary acquiring firm is Sanlam Life, a firm incorporated in South Africa.
Sanlam Life is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sanlam Limited ("Sanlam"). Sanlam is a public company listed on the JSE Limited.
[4] The Sanlam Group's business is organized into four clusters being Sanlam Personal Finance, Sanlam Emerging Markets, Sanlam Investments
and Short-term insurance.
[5] Relevant for the assessment of the proposed transaction are the group's activities conducted through the Sanlam Personal Finance
division. Through various entities, the Sanlam Personal Finance division is active in the provision of medical administration services, managed healthcare services, health risk management and health insurance products.
Primary target firm
[6] The primary target firm is ACT. ACT is wholly-owned by Afrocentric Investment Corporation Limited ("Afrocentric").
[7] In South Africa, Afrocentric controls Afrocentric Health Limited ("AHL") and WAD Holdings (Pty) Ltd. AHL
controls a number of firms and relevant for the assessment of the proposed transaction are Medscheme Holdings (Pty) Ltd ("Medscheme");
Helios IT Solutions (Pty) Ltd; Aid for Aids Management (Pty) Ltd; Resticraft (Ply) Ltd; and Klinnika (Pty) Ltd.
[8] The Afrocentric group is involved in the administration of medical aid funds and managed healthcare activities, as well as the provision of healthcare and related services to end consumers directly as part of an extended administrative or managed healthcare business.
Proposed transaction and rationale
[9] Afrocentric, ACT and Sanlam Life have entered into a subscription agreement in terms of which Sanlam Life will subscribe for shares representing 28.7% of the issued ordinary share capital of ACT for a subscription price of R703 million. Sanlam Life will also acquire certain minority protections in relation to ACT and certain of its subsidiaries, which confer control upon it for the purposes of section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act of 1998[1].
[10] The Sanlam group submitted that it expects growth in the healthcare sectors and does not at present have scale in this sector commensurate with the rest of its retail offerings. It would like to extend a medical scheme offering to its clients.
[11] ACT submitted that the proposed transaction would inter a/ia provide Medscheme with access to the Sanlam group's extensive distribution capabilities.
Impact on competition
[12] The Competition Commission ("Commission") identified a horizontal overlap in the activities of the merging parties in relation to (i) the supply of medical scheme administration services; and (ii) the provision of managed healthcare services.
[13] In the market for the provision of medical scheme administration services, the Commission found that the merging parties will have a combined national market share of approximately [20-30]% with an accretion in market share as a result of the proposed transaction of approximately [0-1]%. The merging parties will continue to face competition from large players such as Discovery Limited ("Discovery") and MM! Holdings Limited ("MMI") and other smaller market participants.
[14] In the market for the provision of managed healthcare services, the Commission found that the merging parties will have a combined national market share of approximately [25-35]%, with an accretion in market share as a result of the proposed transaction of approximately [0-1]%. The merging parties will compete with large players such as Discovery and MMI and other smaller market participants.
[15] The Commission furthermore contacted customers as part of its market investigation and these customers did not raise any concerns
regarding the proposed transaction as they indicated that there are alternatives available to them in the affected markets.
[16] The Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the abovementioned
markets.
[17] We concur with the Commission's conclusion that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
Public interest
[18] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will have no negative impact on employment since no retrenchments are envisaged.[2]
[19] The proposed transaction further raises no other public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[20] In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transactions. Accordingly, we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.
15 September 2015
DATE
________
Mr Andreas Wessels
Prof lmraan I Valodia and Ms Medi Mokuena concurring
Tribunal Researcher: Aneesa Raval
For the merging parties: Kesiah Frank of Glyn Marais Anton Roets of Nortons Inc
For the Commission: Kholiswa Mnisi and Lindiwe Khumalo
[1] Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended.
[2] Merger record inter alia page 11.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.