Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Sappi Papier Holding GMBH v M-Real Corporation (36/LM/Apr09) [2009] ZACT 55; [2009] 2 CPLR 479 (CT) (2 September 2009)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed acquisition would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in the relevant markets for wood-free coated paper and coated mechanical paper. The merging parties' post-merger market shares were not high, and there were numerous credible international competitors. Customers were able to bargain over prices and switch suppliers freely, with no long-term agreements restricting competition. No significant public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The acquisition by Sappi Papier Holding GMBH of M-Real Corporation's South African coated graphic paper export business is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Sappi Papier Holding GMBH

Applicant Counsel: Bowman Gilfillan Inc.

M-Real Corporation

Respondent Counsel: Bowman Gilfillan Inc.

Amounts and remedies

  • Sappi Papier and M Real Global Post Merger Market Share for WFC Paper (%): 13.2
  • Sappi Papier and M Real Global Post Merger Market Share for CM Paper (%): 10
  • APP Market Share for WFC Paper (%): 9.6
  • Newpage Market Share for WFC Paper (%): 5.8
  • Stora Enso Market Share for WFC Paper (%): 5.6
  • Lecta Market Share for WFC Paper (%): 5.4
  • UPM Kymmene Market Share for WFC Paper (%): 4.8
  • Hansol Market Share for WFC Paper (%): 2.4
  • UPM Kymmene Market Share for CM Paper (%): 15.9
  • Stora Enso Market Share for CM Paper (%): 8.7
  • Newpage Market Share for CM Paper (%): 6.9
  • Burgo Market Share for CM Paper (%): 6.4
  • Myllykoski Market Share for CM Paper (%): 5.4
  • Norske Skog Market Share for CM Paper (%): 4.6

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Reasons for Decision

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Sappi Papier Holding GMBH argued that the transaction would add value and enable it to grow its business as a leader in coated fine paper. It submitted that its focus is on expanding its coated fine paper operations and that the acquisition would not negatively affect competition due to the presence of numerous international competitors.
Respondent
M-Real Corporation contended that its business focus is shifting towards packaging, office paper, and specialty paper, and not coated graphic paper. The transaction would allow it to exit the coated graphic paper business in South Africa. Both parties maintained that the market is competitive and customers have access to multiple suppliers globally.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger will only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market.

  2. 02

    Commission findings and customer submissions

    The relevant geographic market for the supply of wood-free coated paper and coated mechanical paper is international, given the ability of customers to source from global suppliers.

  3. 03

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations must be assessed, but only significant concerns warrant intervention.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed acquisition would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in the relevant markets for wood-free coated paper and coated mechanical paper. The merging parties' post-merger market shares were not high, and there were numerous credible international competitors. Customers were able to bargain over prices and switch suppliers freely, with no long-term agreements restricting competition. No significant public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that Paperforce CC's exclusive agency arrangement with M-Real would terminate, and Paperforce was already seeking alternative international suppliers for importation into South Africa.
  • The Tribunal observed that the transaction had previously been approved unconditionally by the European Commission, which excluded South African assets and goodwill.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

  • The acquisition by Sappi Papier Holding GMBH of M-Real Corporation's South African coated graphic paper export business is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2009] ZACT 55

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: 36/LM/Apr09

In the matter between:

Sappi Papier Holding GMBH Acquiring Firm

and

M-Real Corporation Target Firm

Panel : Y Carrim (Presiding Member), M Mokuena (Tribunal

Member) and M Holden (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 08 July 2009

Order issued on : 08 July 2009

Reasons issued on : 02 September 2009

Reasons for Decision

Introduction

On 08 July 2009 the Tribunal unconditionally approved the acquisition by Sappi Papier Holding GMBH of M-Real Corporation. The reasons follow below.

Parties

The primary acquiring firm is Sappi Papier Holding GmbH (“Sappi Papier”), a company incorporated under the laws of Austria. Sappi Papier is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sappi Ltd (“Sappi”), a company registered on the JSE Securities Exchange. Sappi’s largest shareholders are as follows:

Allan Gray 28.38%

Old Mutual Asset Managers 9.48%

Investec Asset Management 8.63%

Public Investment Corporation 7.12%

RMB Asset Management 6.24%

The primary target firm is the business comprising the export of coated graphic paper into South Africa by M-Real Corporation (“herein after referred to as M-Real”). M-Real is incorporated in accordance with the laws of Finland and is listed on the OMX Helsinki Stock Exchange. Its largest shareholder is Metsaliitso Cooperative (“Metsaliitso”) with 38.6% of M-Real’s issued share capital and 60.5% of the voting rights. Metsaliitto has no controlling interest in South Africa.

Parties’ Activities

Sappi Papier and Sappi are global pulp and paper companies and worldwide producers of coated fine paper. In South Africa Sappi operates through two business units, namely, Sappi Fine Paper South Africa and Sappi Forest Products. Sappi Fine Paper produces coated, uncoated graphic and business papers, premium quality packaging papers and a range of specialty papers. Sappi Forest Products comprises Sappi Kraft, Sappi Saiccor and Sappi Forests.

Sappi Kraft makes bleached and unbleached kraft pulp, containerboard, packaging paper and newsprint. Sappi Saiccor is the world’s

largest manufacturer of chemical cellulose which is used in the production of products such as moulding powders and cellophane.

Sappi Forests supplies timber to the mills of Sappi Fine Paper, Sappi Kraft and Sappi Saiccor. Sappi is also the only producer of WFC paper in South Africa.

M-Real is a worldwide supplier of paperboard, coated and coated fine paper, coated magazine paper, specialty paper and pulp. M-Real forms part of the Metsaliitto Group, a global forest industry group. Its business is divided into three business areas, i.e. Office Papers, Consumer Packaging and Other Papers.

Office Papers markets and sells uncoated fine papers for printing, copying as well as for forms, envelopes and manuals. The Consumer Packaging business produces paperboard and its products are used in the beauty care, cigarettes, consumer durables, foods, healthcare and graphics industries. Other Papers business area provides coated and uncoated papers as well as specialty papers and related services to publishing, advertising and communication end-users.

M-Real does not carry any production activities in South Africa as all its facilities (mills) are located in Europe. The sale and distribution of its products in South Africa are carried out by Paperforce CC (an independent agent), which has been M-Real’s agent since the mid 1990’s. Paperforce CC is M-Real’s exclusive agent in SA, Zimbabwe and Lesotho.1

The transaction

In terms of the structure of the transaction, Sappi Papier intends to acquire the business comprising the export of certain coated graphic paper into South Africa (“M-Real SA business”). The Commission submits that a similar transaction to this one was notified to the European Commission (“EC”) and was approved unconditionally in October 2008.

The EC transaction involved the sale of four out of eight mills owned by M-Real in Europe which produced coated graphic paper. This transaction excluded the know-how, brands, order books, customer lists, intellectual property and goodwill in M-Real’s coated graphic paper business in South Africa.

Rationale

[11] Sappi submitted, inter alia, that this transaction will add value and also enable it to grow its business as a leader in coated fine paper. M-Real submitted that its business focus is on packaging, office paper and certain specialty paper and not coated graphic paper business. This transaction will therefore enable it to exit the coated graphic paper business.

Overlapping Products

[12] The activities of the merging parties overlap in respect of wood-free coated paper (“WFC”) and coated mechanical paper (“CM”). According to the merging parties, WFC paper is superior for printing compared to all other kinds of graphic paper because of its weight and surface properties. WFC paper is also described as being stable, does not change colour, turn yellow or deteriorate with time. It is used for the production of promotional materials, premium magazines, books and to a lesser extent for the production of business and transactional materials and newspapers.

[13] The merging parties have submitted that CM paper is of a lesser quality than WFC paper because in the chemical pulping involved, the wood residue and lignin does not fully dissolve thus resulting in yellowing of paper with exposure to light which then reduces the life span of the paper. CM paper is used in to produce lower quality magazine finishes such as for example YOU, Edgars Club magazine etc.

Geographic Market

[14] Customers of the merging parties contacted by the Commission submitted that they are able and do approach international producers directly for their supplies. Customers such as Caxton, Peters Papers and Antalis indicated that they source from South Africa, Europe, Finland, North and South America and the Far East. Further, there is no local producer of CM paper and all CM paper supplied in South Africa is imported.

[15] In addition, competitors of the merging parties for both WFC paper and CM paper are international suppliers such as APP, Stora Enso, UPM- Kymmene, Hansol, Myllykoski and Norske Skog. The relevant geographic market for the supply of WFC paper and CM paper is therefore international.

Competition Analysis

[16] The merging parties’ global post-merger market share for the supply of WFC paper and CM paper is 13.2% and 10.0% respectively. The Commission found that there are many other credible competitors in both affected markets from whom the merging parties would still face competition. In the market for WFC paper competitors include APP (9.6%), Newpage (5.8%) Stora Enso (5.6%), Lecta (5.4%), UPM-Kymmene (4.8%) Hansol (2.4%) and others. In the market for CM paper competitors include UPM-Kymmene (15.9%), Stora Enso (8.7%), Newpage (6.9%), Burgo (6.4%) Myllykoski (5.4), Norske Skog (4.6%) and many others.2

[17] Both customers and competitors of the merging parties contacted by the Commission did not raise concerns with the merger. Customers such as Caxton, Antalis and Peters Papers indicated that they are able to bargain over prices with suppliers and are able to switch between suppliers as there are no long term agreements in place. Further, it is unlikely that this transaction will have a negative impact on the ability of these customers to import their products from oversees suppliers. Similarly competitors such as UPM-Kymmene, Stora Enso and Myllykoski do not have any concerns about the merger.

[18] Based on the above, we agree with the Commission that this transaction is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition considering the presence of many other credible suppliers in both affected markets.

Public Interest

[19] The transaction does not raise any significant public interest concerns.

_______ 02 September 2009

Y Carrim Date

M Mokuena and M Holden concurring.

Tribunal Researcher : I Selaledi

For the merging parties : Bowman Gilfillan Inc.

For the Commission : T Masithulela

1 The parties have submitted that this arrangement will terminate and it is their understanding that Paperforce CC is already approaching

other international suppliers with a view to importing on their behalf in South Africa.

2 Others include firms such as Nippon Paper, Oji Paper, Hokuetsu, Arjo Wiggins, Mitsubishi, Shandong Chenming etc.

6

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.