SASBO v Standard Bank of South Africa (J2298/10) [2010] ZALCJHB 375 (12 November 2010)

SASBO v Standard Bank of South Africa (J2298/10) [2010] ZALCJHB 375 (12 November 2010)

The court found that while the consultation process between SASBO and Standard Bank was brief and not as substantial as required for a genuine joint consensus-seeking process, the bank's proposal to provide further information and engage in additional meetings addressed the union's outstanding concerns. The union failed to assert its rights at the appropriate time, and its objections to the process were raised belatedly. The court held that blanket orders compelling compliance with section 189A are of limited value and that orders should be crafted to address specific procedural defects. The relief sought to halt individual consultations with the remaining employees was not justified, as...

Citation
[2010] ZALCJHB 375
Parties
Applicant: SASBO; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 November 2010
Case Number
J2298/10
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application Under Section 189 A(13) of the LRA for Urgent Relief Prior to Retrenchment
Outcome
Application partially granted with structured relief; no order as to costs.
Judges
Lagrange
Legal Topics
Retrenchment Consultation, Section 189a Application, Collective Agreements, Procedural Fairness, Urgent Interdict, Operational Requirements Dismissal
Labour Law Civil Procedure Retrenchment Consultation Section 189a Application Collective Agreements Procedural Fairness Urgent Interdict Operational Requirements Dismissal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SASBO

Applicant

Standard Bank of South Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application Under Section 189 A(13) of the LRA for Urgent Relief Prior to Retrenchment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent complied with section 189A and the Code of Good Practice on Dismissal based on Operational Requirements prior to retrenching SASBO members.
  2. 2 Whether the consultation process between the union and the bank was meaningful and sufficient.
  3. 3 Whether the bank should be compelled to disclose all relevant information regarding alternatives to retrenchment and cost savings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the consultation process between SASBO and Standard Bank was brief and not as substantial as required for a genuine joint consensus-seeking process, the bank's proposal to provide further information and engage in additional meetings addressed the union's outstanding concerns. The union failed to assert its rights at the appropriate time, and its objections to the process were raised belatedly. The court held that blanket orders compelling compliance with section 189A are of limited value and that orders should be crafted to address specific procedural defects. The relief sought to halt individual consultations with the remaining employees was not justified, as...

Court Disposition

Application partially granted with structured relief; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The undertakings in the bank's letter to SASBO of 11 November 2010 are placed on record.
  • If consensus on ways to avoid or minimize retrenchments is not reached, the parties must hold two further meetings at least one working day apart before 1 December 2010.