Sasol Gas Proprietary Limited v Competition Commission Of South Africa and Others (212.CAC.Apr23 CT; OTH110Sep22) [2023] ZACAC 5 (5 May 2023)

Sasol Gas Proprietary Limited v Competition Commission Of South Africa and Others (212.CAC.Apr23 CT; OTH110Sep22) [2023] ZACAC 5 (5 May 2023)

The Court determined that, subject to the specified conditions, Part B of the applicant’s application should be transferred from the Competition Tribunal to the Competition Appeal Court for determination. The Court further ordered that a hearing for procedural directions would be held either upon the Tribunal’s...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] ZACAC 5
Parties
Applicant: Sasol Gas Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Competition Commission Of South Africa; Respondent: Industrial Gas Users’ Association of Southern Africa; Respondent: Egoli Gas Proprietary Limited; Respondent: National Energy Regulator of South Africa
Court
Competition Appeal Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
212.CAC.Apr23 CT
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Transfer and Procedural Directions
Outcome
Part B of the application is transferred to the Competition Appeal Court for determination. A further hearing for procedural directions will be held as specified. No order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Competition Appeal Court, Transfer of Proceedings, Procedural Directions
Competition Law Jurisdiction of Competition Appeal Court Transfer of Proceedings Procedural Directions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sasol Gas Proprietary Limited

Applicant

Competition Commission Of South Africa

Respondent

Industrial Gas Users’ Association of Southern Africa

Respondent

Egoli Gas Proprietary Limited

Respondent

National Energy Regulator of South Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Transfer and Procedural Directions

  1. 1 Whether Part B of the application should be transferred from the Competition Tribunal to the Competition Appeal Court for determination.
  2. 2 What procedural directions should be issued regarding the further hearing of the matter.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that, subject to the specified conditions, Part B of the applicant’s application should be transferred from the Competition Tribunal to the Competition Appeal Court for determination. The Court further ordered that a hearing for procedural directions would be held either upon the Tribunal’s determination of Part A of the application or within one calendar month of the date of the order, or such further period as may be determined by the Judge President. No order as to costs was made, reflecting the absence of opposition and the procedural nature of the application.

Court Disposition

Part B of the application is transferred to the Competition Appeal Court for determination. A further hearing for procedural directions will be held as specified. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • Part B of the applicant’s application under case number OTH110Sep22 is transferred to the roll of the Competition Appeal Court for determination.
  • A further hearing for procedural directions in terms of section 38(2A)(e) will be held upon a determination by the Tribunal in Part A of the application or within one calendar month of the date of this order or such further period as may be determined by the Judge President.