Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Labour Court Johannesburg

SATAWU obo Mbano and Another v Moodyblue Trade Invest 14 (Pty) Ltd and Others (Leave to Appeal) (J1016/2019) [2023] ZALCJHB 129 (5 May 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Upon consideration of the papers filed of record, including the judgment sought to be appealed, the court finds that reasonable prospects of success exist that the Labour Appeal Court may construe differently the submissions on which the judgment is based and may find in favour of the applicants. The application for leave to appeal is therefore granted.

Court disposition

Leave to appeal granted.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is granted.
  • There is no order as to costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

SATAWU obo Mandla Mbano & Tongayi Chenkenyu

Applicant

Moodyblue Trade Invest 14 (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Niel Damaras

Respondent

Diana Smuts

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant contends that the court erred in finding that the applicant did not refute the first respondent's submissions that its transport services had been transferred to Hermis Transport. The applicant submits that, but for this error, the court would have found that the respondents acted mala fide in not reinstating the individual applicants, which would have resulted in judgment in their favour.
Respondent
The application for leave to appeal is unopposed; no arguments were submitted by the respondents.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Martin & East (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers & others (2014) 35 ILJ 2399 (LAC)

    The test for leave to appeal is whether the applicant has prospects of success on appeal.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Upon consideration of the papers filed of record, including the judgment sought to be appealed, the court finds that reasonable prospects of success exist that the Labour Appeal Court may construe differently the submissions on which the judgment is based and may find in favour of the applicants. The application for leave to appeal is therefore granted.

Court disposition

Leave to appeal granted.

  • The application for leave to appeal is granted.
  • There is no order as to costs.

Source and reliance status

Labour Court Johannesburg

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Labour Court Johannesburg

Judgment

[2023] ZALCJHB 129

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA,

HELD

AT JOHANNESBURG

Case no: J1016/2019

Not reportable

In the matter between:

SATAWU obo MANDLA MBANO & TONGAYI CHENKENYU Applicant

And

MOODYBLUE TRADE INVEST 14(PTY) LTD

First Respondent

NIEL

DAMARAS

Second Respondent

DIANA

SMUTS

Third Respondent

Date of Judgment: This judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’ legal representatives by email, publication on the Labour Court website and release to SAFLII. The date and time for handing down judgment is deemed to be 10h00 on 05 May 2023

JUDGMENT – LEAVE TO APPEAL

LALLIE J

Introduction

[1] The applicant launched this application for leave to appeal against the whole judgment handed down by this court on 6 May 2000. The application as launched on time, however, it is only on 30 March 2023 that the directive for the applicant to effect proper service of the application on the respondents was complied with. The application is unopposed.

[2] The applicant’s main ground grounds for leave to appeal are that I erred in finding that the applicant did not refute the first respondent’s submissions that its transport services has been transferred to Hermis Transport. It was submitted that had the error not been made, I would have found that the applicant had proved that the respondents acted mala fide in not reinstating the individual applicants. The finding would have resulted in a judgment in their favour.

[3] The test for leave to appeal is whether the applicants has prospects of success on appeal.[1]

A consideration of the papers filed of record including the judgment the applicant seeks leave to appeal against support the applicant’s

case that reasonable prospects of success exists that the Labour Appeal Court may construe differently the submissions on which the judgment is based and find in favour of the applicants.

[4] In the premises, the following order is made;

Order:

1. The application for leave to appeal is granted

2. There is no order as to costs.

Lallie J

Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa

(In chambers)

[1] Martin & East (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers & others (2014) 35 ILJ 2399 (LAC)

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Martin & East (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers & others (2014) 35 ILJ 2399 (LAC)

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.