Saudi Arabian Oil Company v Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (LM029May19) [2019] ZACT 75 (21 October 2019)
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger between Saudi Arabian Oil Company and Saudi Basic Industries Corporation would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in any relevant market. The merged entity's market shares in the relevant product markets (EPDM, PE, and PBR) would remain moderate, and significant competitors would continue to exert competitive constraints. Concerns raised about the creation of a consortium through joint ventures were investigated and found to be unfounded, as the joint ventures were limited in scope and did not facilitate anti-competitive coordination. Furthermore, the transaction did not raise any public interest concerns....
- Citation
- [2019] ZACT 75
- Parties
- Applicant: Saudi Arabian Oil Company; Respondent: Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2019
- Case Number
- LM029May19
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Control / Tribunal Approval
- Outcome
- The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- A Roskam, E Daniels, AW Wessels
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Market Share Analysis, Public Interest, Joint Ventures, Product Overlap
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saudi Arabian Oil Company
Applicant
Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Tribunal Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger between Saudi Arabian Oil Company and Saudi Basic Industries Corporation will substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger between Saudi Arabian Oil Company and Saudi Basic Industries Corporation would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in any relevant market. The merged entity's market shares in the relevant product markets (EPDM, PE, and PBR) would remain moderate, and significant competitors would continue to exert competitive constraints. Concerns raised about the creation of a consortium through joint ventures were investigated and found to be unfounded, as the joint ventures were limited in scope and did not facilitate anti-competitive coordination. Furthermore, the transaction did not raise any public interest concerns....
Court Disposition
The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment