Schmidt v Road Accident Fund (4834/05) [2006] ZAGPHC 64; [2007] 2 All SA 338 (W) (23 June 2006)

Schmidt v Road Accident Fund (4834/05) [2006] ZAGPHC 64; [2007] 2 All SA 338 (W) (23 June 2006)

The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe multiple orthopaedic injuries, chronic pain, psychological sequelae, and permanent disability, materially affecting her life and earning capacity. While expert evidence diverged on her future employability, the court accepted the defendant's experts' view that the plaintiff retained residual earning capacity for sedentary work after initial interventions. The risk of MRSA infection recurring was found to be minimal based on Dr Lautenbach's testimony. The court applied a 15% contingency deduction to the 'but for' scenario and a 40% deduction to the 'having regard to' scenario, resulting in a future loss of earning capacity of R439,523....

Citation
[2006] ZAGPHC 64
Parties
Plaintiff: Bernell Schmidt; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 June 2006
Case Number
4834/05
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant is ordered to pay R1,646,852.23 plus interest and costs, including the costs of two counsel, and to furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses under s 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act.
Judges
FHD Van Oosten
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Bodily Injury Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity, General Damages, Quantum of Damages
Delict Civil Procedure Road Accident Fund Act Bodily Injury Damages Loss of Earning Capacity General Damages Quantum of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bernell Schmidt

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the plaintiff's bodily injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident.
  2. 2 Is the plaintiff entitled to compensation for future loss of earning capacity and general damages.
  3. 3 Should the defendant furnish an undertaking for future medical and ancillary expenses under s 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe multiple orthopaedic injuries, chronic pain, psychological sequelae, and permanent disability, materially affecting her life and earning capacity. While expert evidence diverged on her future employability, the court accepted the defendant's experts' view that the plaintiff retained residual earning capacity for sedentary work after initial interventions. The risk of MRSA infection recurring was found to be minimal based on Dr Lautenbach's testimony. The court applied a 15% contingency deduction to the 'but for' scenario and a 40% deduction to the 'having regard to' scenario, resulting in a future loss of earning capacity of R439,523....

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant is ordered to pay R1,646,852.23 plus interest and costs, including the costs of two counsel, and to furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses under s 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's claim for general damages is amended to R800,000.
  • The defendant must pay the plaintiff R1,646,852.23 plus interest at 15.5% per annum from 14 days after judgment to date of payment.