Scott NO and Another v Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality (920/2012) [2013] ZAECPEHC 3 (29 January 2013)
The court found that the respondent failed to make a decision on the applicants' proposal for amendment of a servitude, despite an obligation to do so and an undisputed undertaking to communicate its decision. The applicants established a clear right to a decision and to specific performance regarding electricity supply, as the respondent had approved building plans and accepted payment. The court held that the servitude could be amended by agreement, as envisaged in the title deed, and that fairness justified the imposition of the court's decision. However, because the servitude benefits members of the public, justice and fairness require that interested parties be notified and afforded...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAECPEHC 3
- Parties
- Applicant: Cameron Scott N.O.; Applicant: Anthony James Charlton Reid N.O.; Respondent: Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2013
- Case Number
- 920/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Rule Nisi Issued; Interim Relief Pending Final Determination
- Outcome
- Rule Nisi issued; interim relief granted for electricity supply; provisional order for amendment of servitude subject to notice to interested parties.
- Judges
- N Dambuza
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Servitude Amendment, Mandamus, Joinder, Specific Performance, Municipal Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cameron Scott N.O.
Applicant
Anthony James Charlton Reid N.O.
Applicant
Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Rule Nisi Issued; Interim Relief Pending Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's failure to make a decision on the applicants' proposal for amendment of a servitude is unlawful.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to an order compelling the respondent to provide electricity supply to the property.
- 3 Whether the Registrar of Deeds was required to be joined as a party to the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to make a decision on the applicants' proposal for amendment of a servitude, despite an obligation to do so and an undisputed undertaking to communicate its decision. The applicants established a clear right to a decision and to specific performance regarding electricity supply, as the respondent had approved building plans and accepted payment. The court held that the servitude could be amended by agreement, as envisaged in the title deed, and that fairness justified the imposition of the court's decision. However, because the servitude benefits members of the public, justice and fairness require that interested parties be notified and afforded...
Court Disposition
Rule Nisi issued; interim relief granted for electricity supply; provisional order for amendment of servitude subject to notice to interested parties.
Orders
- A Rule Nisi is issued calling upon interested parties to show cause before the Court on or before 5 March 2013 why the following order should not be granted.
- Within seven days of this order, the respondent is to provide a supply of electricity to the applicants at erf 6888 Korsten as undertaken in the electricity supply agreement dated 27 October 2010.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment