Sea Harvest Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Sea Harvest Group Ltd v Viking Fishing Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Viking Fishing Aquaculture (Pty) Ltd (LM261Jan18) [2018] ZACT 68 (26 September 2018)

Sea Harvest Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Sea Harvest Group Ltd v Viking Fishing Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Viking Fishing Aquaculture (Pty) Ltd (LM261Jan18) [2018] ZACT 68 (26 September 2018)

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Although the merger would result in a high level of market concentration and create structural links between major industry players, the size of Viking Fishing was not sufficient to cause a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] ZACT 68
Parties
Applicant: Sea Harvest Corporation (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Sea Harvest Group Ltd; Respondent: Viking Fishing Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Viking Fishing Aquaculture (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
LM261Jan18
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Reasons
Outcome
Merger approved subject to conditions.
Judges
Andiswa Ndoni, Imraan Valodia, Medi Mokuena
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Market Concentration, Information Sharing Conditions, Public Interest, Employment Protection
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Merger Control Market Concentration Information Sharing Conditions Public Interest Employment Protection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sea Harvest Corporation (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Sea Harvest Group Ltd

Applicant

Viking Fishing Holdings (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Viking Fishing Aquaculture (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Reasons

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger between Sea Harvest and Viking Fishing would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether the merger raises public interest concerns, including employment and information sharing.
  3. 3 Whether conditions should be imposed to prevent anti-competitive information exchange post-merger.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Although the merger would result in a high level of market concentration and create structural links between major industry players, the size of Viking Fishing was not sufficient to cause a substantial lessening of competition. The Tribunal accepted that Brimstone's shareholding did not introduce new competitive concerns and that undertakings regarding director appointments mitigated risks of information exchange. The Tribunal also considered public interest factors, noting that the merger would secure employment for 1500 employees and raised no other significant...

Court Disposition

Merger approved subject to conditions.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction is approved subject to conditions attached as annexure 'A', including formalization of undertakings on information sharing and director appointments.