Seale and Others v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Another (2023/078684) [2023] ZAGPPHC 754 (25 August 2023)
The court found that the Applicants were unlawfully evicted and their homes demolished by the Respondents without a valid court order, in direct contravention of section 26(3) of the Constitution and PIE. The Respondents' reliance on a 2017 interdict against unidentified persons could not justify ongoing evictions...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPPHC 754
- Parties
- Applicant: Nakampe Rector Seale; Applicant: The Rabie Ridge Community; Respondent: City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: MMC for Housing, City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality, Anthea Natasha Leitch N.O.
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2023
- Case Number
- 2023/078684
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Urgent Application for Constitutional and Spoliation Relief
- Outcome
- Application granted. The Respondents are ordered to restore possession and reconstruct shelters or pay compensation, and are interdicted from further evictions or harassment without a court order. Costs awarded on attorney and own client scale.
- Judges
- WJ du Plessis
- Legal Topics
- Right to Housing, Unlawful Eviction, Mandament Van Spolie, Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act, Constitutional Damages, Interdict Relief
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nakampe Rector Seale
Applicant
The Rabie Ridge Community
Applicant
City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
MMC for Housing, City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality, Anthea Natasha Leitch N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Urgent Application for Constitutional and Spoliation Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents unlawfully evicted the Applicants and demolished their homes without a court order in contravention of section 26(3) of the Constitution and PIE.
- 2 Whether the Applicants are entitled to restoration of possession and reconstruction of their shelters under the mandament van spolie and constitutional remedies.
- 3 Whether the 2017 interdict relied upon by the Respondents can justify ongoing evictions and demolitions against identified occupiers.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicants were unlawfully evicted and their homes demolished by the Respondents without a valid court order, in direct contravention of section 26(3) of the Constitution and PIE. The Respondents' reliance on a 2017 interdict against unidentified persons could not justify ongoing evictions against the present, identified Applicants. The evidence, including photographs, videos, and in loco inspection, established that the Applicants had peaceful and undisturbed possession, and the Respondents' actions amounted to spoliation. The Applicants are entitled to restoration of possession and reconstruction of their shelters, or monetary compensation if restoration is not...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The Respondents are ordered to restore possession and reconstruct shelters or pay compensation, and are interdicted from further evictions or harassment without a court order. Costs awarded on attorney and own client scale.
Orders
- Non-compliance with court rules is condoned; matter heard on urgent basis.
- Evictions by Respondents at Farm Allandale are declared unlawful and unconstitutional.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment