Security Patrol Experts CC v Commissionf for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (J1934/07, J2641/02, J2522/01, JR2113/07) [2007] ZALC 91 (4 December 2007)
The court found that the alleged order dated 21 September 2007 was not issued by the Labour Court. Multiple factors established this: the judge named on the order was not present in Johannesburg at the relevant time; the matter was not on the court roll; the interpreter and registrar confirmed no hearing occurred; and the purported counsel who allegedly moved the application did not exist. The evidence showed that the applicant's representative, Kerry Stuart, fabricated documents and lied under oath, amounting to fraud and perjury. The court held that Stuart was not a fit and proper person to be admitted to the legal profession and referred the matter for investigation by the Law Society,...
- Citation
- [2007] ZALC 91
- Parties
- Applicant: Security Patrol Experts CC; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner N Cele; Respondent: Alfred Mogalele
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 2007
- Case Number
- J1934/07, J2641/02, J2522/01, JR2113/07
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment on Authenticity of Alleged Court Order and Related Conduct
- Outcome
- The alleged court order dated 21 September 2007 was declared not to have been issued by the Labour Court. The conduct of Kerry Stuart was referred for investigation for fraud and perjury.
- Judges
- Francis
- Legal Topics
- Fraud on the Court, Perjury, Urgent Stay Application, Arbitration Award Enforcement, Professional Misconduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Security Patrol Experts CC
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner N Cele
Respondent
Alfred Mogalele
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment on Authenticity of Alleged Court Order and Related Conduct
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court issued the order allegedly granted on 21 September 2007.
- 2 Whether the conduct of Kerry Stuart and others amounted to fraud and perjury before the court.
- 3 Whether the third respondent was properly served and given the opportunity to oppose the urgent application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the alleged order dated 21 September 2007 was not issued by the Labour Court. Multiple factors established this: the judge named on the order was not present in Johannesburg at the relevant time; the matter was not on the court roll; the interpreter and registrar confirmed no hearing occurred; and the purported counsel who allegedly moved the application did not exist. The evidence showed that the applicant's representative, Kerry Stuart, fabricated documents and lied under oath, amounting to fraud and perjury. The court held that Stuart was not a fit and proper person to be admitted to the legal profession and referred the matter for investigation by the Law Society,...
Court Disposition
The alleged court order dated 21 September 2007 was declared not to have been issued by the Labour Court. The conduct of Kerry Stuart was referred for investigation for fraud and perjury.
Orders
- The court order marked 'annexure A' was not issued by this Court on 21 September 2007.
- The registrar must submit a copy of this judgment, the court order marked 'A', transcripts of proceedings on 19, 22, 23, 24 and 26 October 2007, and the affidavit of Kerry Stuart to the Law Society of the Northern Provinces, the Director of Public Prosecutions, and the South African Police Services for further...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment