Sefora v MEC for the Department of Health: Gauteng (14479/21) [2024] ZAGPPHC 840 (27 August 2024)
The court found that the applicant's claim had not prescribed and that her personal circumstances, including grief and lack of legal knowledge, constituted good cause for the delay in serving the statutory notice. The respondent failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice resulting from the absence of a hospital admission number, as the deceased's identity number was provided and the hospital's records are computerized. The respondent's objections were theoretical and unsupported by evidence of actual difficulty in locating the relevant files. The court held that the requirements for condonation under section 3(4) of the Act were met and that it was just to grant the application.
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPPHC 840
- Parties
- Applicant: Sefora Elizabeth Malesa; Respondent: MEC for the Department of Health: Gauteng
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2024
- Case Number
- 14479/21
- Procedural Posture
- Condonation Application / Application for Condonation for Non Compliance With Statutory Notice Requirements Prior to Institution of Damages Claim.
- Outcome
- Condonation for non-compliance with section 3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act is granted with costs.
- Judges
- Kumalo
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Organs of State Act, Loss of Support, Negligence, Statutory Notice Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sefora Elizabeth Malesa
Applicant
MEC for the Department of Health: Gauteng
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Condonation Application / Application for Condonation for Non Compliance With Statutory Notice Requirements Prior to Institution of Damages Claim.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for condonation of non-compliance with section 3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act.
- 2 Whether the respondent will suffer prejudice if condonation is granted.
- 3 Whether the absence of a hospital admission number precludes the respondent from investigating the claim.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's claim had not prescribed and that her personal circumstances, including grief and lack of legal knowledge, constituted good cause for the delay in serving the statutory notice. The respondent failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice resulting from the absence of a hospital admission number, as the deceased's identity number was provided and the hospital's records are computerized. The respondent's objections were theoretical and unsupported by evidence of actual difficulty in locating the relevant files. The court held that the requirements for condonation under section 3(4) of the Act were met and that it was just to grant the application.
Court Disposition
Condonation for non-compliance with section 3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act is granted with costs.
Orders
- The points in limine are dismissed.
- The application for condonation is granted with costs, including counsel's costs on scale B.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment