Segakweng v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 848/15) [2020] ZALCJHB 243 (14 September 2020)
The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory and acceptable explanation for the excessive delay in filing the record and supplementary affidavit, with most reasons relating to internal union issues and personal circumstances that do not constitute valid grounds for condonation. The request for extension was made two years after the deadline, which is unreasonable. The applicant's reliance on union difficulties and inability to pay legal fees is not sustainable, especially as the union was responsible for costs. The applicant's prospects of success in the review are non-existent, as the arbitration award was detailed, reasonable, and supported by evidence. The interests of justice do not...
- Citation
- [2020] ZALCJHB 243
- Parties
- Applicant: Godfrey Segakweng; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Eric Myhill N.O; Respondent: South African Post Office
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2020
- Case Number
- JR 848/15
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application for Condonation and Reinstatement of Review
- Outcome
- Application for condonation and reinstatement of review dismissed; review application dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Tlhotlhalemaje
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Review of Arbitration Award, Practice Manual Compliance, Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Godfrey Segakweng
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Eric Myhill N.O
Respondent
South African Post Office
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Condonation and Reinstatement of Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for condonation of the late filing of the record and supplementary affidavit.
- 2 Whether the review application should be reinstated after being deemed withdrawn and archived.
- 3 Whether the applicant's explanation for delay is reasonable and acceptable.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory and acceptable explanation for the excessive delay in filing the record and supplementary affidavit, with most reasons relating to internal union issues and personal circumstances that do not constitute valid grounds for condonation. The request for extension was made two years after the deadline, which is unreasonable. The applicant's reliance on union difficulties and inability to pay legal fees is not sustainable, especially as the union was responsible for costs. The applicant's prospects of success in the review are non-existent, as the arbitration award was detailed, reasonable, and supported by evidence. The interests of justice do not...
Court Disposition
Application for condonation and reinstatement of review dismissed; review application dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The application for condonation for the late filing of the record and supplementary affidavit is dismissed.
- The application to reinstate the review application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment