Segal and Another v Master of the High Court Cape Town and Others (145/19) [2020] ZAWCHC 144 (22 October 2020)
The Court found that the contested Will was signed by the deceased and represented his true intention regarding the disposition of his estate. The surrounding circumstances, including the deceased's estrangement from his family and the specific instructions in the Will, demonstrated clear testamentary intention. The forensic handwriting report was admitted as evidence, and the respondents did not dispute the authenticity of the signature or the contents of the Will. The delay in bringing the application was justified by the applicants' efforts to trace the deceased's family, and no prejudice would result from condonation. The Court condoned the non-compliance with the witnessing...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAWCHC 144
- Parties
- Applicant: Louis Brian Segal; Applicant: Brian David Sarembock; Respondent: Master of the High Court Cape Town; Respondent: Stevan Melmed; Respondent: Ronald Melmed; Respondent: Ronald Melmed N.O.
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2020
- Case Number
- 145/19
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Application to Declare Will Valid and Condone Non Compliance With Formalities
- Outcome
- Application granted. The Will is declared valid and non-compliance with formalities is condoned.
- Judges
- LekhULENI
- Legal Topics
- Wills Act Section 2 3, Condonation of Non Compliance, Testamentary Intention, Administration of Estates Act, Hearsay Evidence Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Louis Brian Segal
Applicant
Brian David Sarembock
Applicant
Master of the High Court Cape Town
Respondent
Stevan Melmed
Respondent
Ronald Melmed
Respondent
Ronald Melmed N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Application to Declare Will Valid and Condone Non Compliance With Formalities
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contested Will is the Last Will and Testament of the deceased.
- 2 Whether the Court can condone non-compliance with section 2(1)(a)(ii) and (iii) of the Wills Act.
- 3 Whether the declaratory orders sought would cause prejudice to the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the contested Will was signed by the deceased and represented his true intention regarding the disposition of his estate. The surrounding circumstances, including the deceased's estrangement from his family and the specific instructions in the Will, demonstrated clear testamentary intention. The forensic handwriting report was admitted as evidence, and the respondents did not dispute the authenticity of the signature or the contents of the Will. The delay in bringing the application was justified by the applicants' efforts to trace the deceased's family, and no prejudice would result from condonation. The Court condoned the non-compliance with the witnessing...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The Will is declared valid and non-compliance with formalities is condoned.
Orders
- The Will signed on 31 March 2012 by the late Leonard Samuel Melmed is declared the Last Will and Testament of the deceased despite not being witnessed, and the Master is directed to accept it as such.
- The failure to comply with section 2(1)(a)(ii) and (iii) of the Wills Act is condoned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment