Segele v African Bank Ltd and Others (NCT/ 278/2009/138 (1)(P)) [2010] ZANCT 5 (14 January 2010)
The Tribunal found that the applicant had properly applied for debt review and that the debt counsellor had determined the applicant was experiencing difficulty in meeting her credit obligations. The debt counsellor facilitated a restructuring agreement, to which all credit providers and the applicant consented. The Tribunal was satisfied that the requirements of sections 86(7)(b) and 138(1) of the National Credit Act were met. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the draft consent order as an order of the Tribunal, warning the parties that non-compliance would constitute an offence under section 160(1) of the Act.
- Citation
- [2010] ZANCT 5
- Parties
- Applicant: Keneuoe Regina Segele; Respondent: African Bank Limited; Respondent: First National Bank t/a First Rand Bank; Respondent: Health-Worx Centurion; Respondent: Markhams a division of Foschini Retail Group (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Revenue Consulting (Pty) Ltd t/a Revco; Respondent: Truworths Limited; Respondent: Woolworths; Respondent: Wesbank t/a a division of First Rand Bank
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2010
- Case Number
- NCT/ 278/2009/138 (1)(P)
- Procedural Posture
- Consent Order Application / Final Order
- Outcome
- Consent order granted; debt restructuring agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Judges
- Tanya Woker
- Legal Topics
- Debt Review, Debt Restructuring, National Credit Act, Consent Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keneuoe Regina Segele
Applicant
African Bank Limited
Respondent
First National Bank t/a First Rand Bank
Respondent
Health-Worx Centurion
Respondent
Markhams a division of Foschini Retail Group (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Revenue Consulting (Pty) Ltd t/a Revco
Respondent
Truworths Limited
Respondent
Woolworths
Respondent
Wesbank t/a a division of First Rand Bank
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consent Order Application / Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant qualifies for debt review and restructuring under the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the parties have validly consented to a debt rearrangement agreement.
- 3 Whether the Tribunal should confirm the draft consent order as an order of the Tribunal.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicant had properly applied for debt review and that the debt counsellor had determined the applicant was experiencing difficulty in meeting her credit obligations. The debt counsellor facilitated a restructuring agreement, to which all credit providers and the applicant consented. The Tribunal was satisfied that the requirements of sections 86(7)(b) and 138(1) of the National Credit Act were met. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the draft consent order as an order of the Tribunal, warning the parties that non-compliance would constitute an offence under section 160(1) of the Act.
Court Disposition
Consent order granted; debt restructuring agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
Orders
- The draft consent order attached as Annexure 'A' is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- The payment structures set out in Annexure 'B' are made an order of the Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment