Seleso v Road Accident Fund (4361/2018) [2022] ZAFSHC 128 (25 February 2022)

Seleso v Road Accident Fund (4361/2018) [2022] ZAFSHC 128 (25 February 2022)

The court found that the plaintiff sustained serious and permanent injuries, including cervical spine and tibia plateau fractures, resulting in ongoing pain, headaches, and permanent scarring. The plaintiff's particulars of claim were deficient and did not comply with Uniform Rule 18(10), but the defendant did not except to these deficiencies. The court exercised its discretion to determine fair compensation for general damages, considering the expert evidence, the plaintiff's ongoing symptoms, and the lack of directly comparable awards. The court awarded R580,000 for general damages, finding this amount appropriate given the nature and extent of the injuries and the impact on the...

Citation
[2022] ZAFSHC 128
Parties
Plaintiff: Teboho Ben Seleso; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
25 February 2022
Case Number
4361/2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Merits Settled
Outcome
The plaintiff's claim for general damages is granted. The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R994,588.65, comprising R414,588.65 for loss of earnings and R580,000 for general damages, and to provide an undertaking for future medical expenses under section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act.
Judges
Molitsoane
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, General Damages, Quantum of Damages, Personal Injury, Uniform Rule 18
Civil Procedure Delict Road Accident Fund Act General Damages Quantum of Damages Personal Injury Uniform Rule 18

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teboho Ben Seleso

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Merits Settled

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for injuries sustained in the motor vehicle collision.
  2. 2 Whether the particulars of claim comply with Uniform Rule 18(10) regarding the pleading of damages.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate quantum for general damages given the nature and extent of the plaintiff's injuries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff sustained serious and permanent injuries, including cervical spine and tibia plateau fractures, resulting in ongoing pain, headaches, and permanent scarring. The plaintiff's particulars of claim were deficient and did not comply with Uniform Rule 18(10), but the defendant did not except to these deficiencies. The court exercised its discretion to determine fair compensation for general damages, considering the expert evidence, the plaintiff's ongoing symptoms, and the lack of directly comparable awards. The court awarded R580,000 for general damages, finding this amount appropriate given the nature and extent of the injuries and the impact on the...

Court Disposition

The plaintiff's claim for general damages is granted. The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R994,588.65, comprising R414,588.65 for loss of earnings and R580,000 for general damages, and to provide an undertaking for future medical expenses under section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act.

Orders

  • The defendant must pay the plaintiff R994,588.65, consisting of R414,588.65 for loss of earnings and R580,000 for general damages.
  • The defendant must furnish the plaintiff with an undertaking in terms of section 17(4)(a) of Act 56 of 1996 for future medical expenses arising from the injuries sustained in the collision.