Sengadi v Tsambo (40344/2018) [2018] ZAGPJHC 613; 2019 (4) SA 50 (GJ) (3 November 2018)
The court found that the applicant and the deceased had complied with the requirements of section 3(1) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, having negotiated and celebrated their marriage in accordance with living customary law. The insistence on the physical handing over of the bride as an indispensable prerequisite was rejected as inconsistent with constitutional values of equality and dignity. The court held that the custom of handing over the bride is not a lawful requirement for the existence of a customary law marriage where the statutory requirements have been met. The applicant was declared the lawful customary law wife of the deceased and entitled to burial rights....
- Citation
- [2018] ZAGPJHC 613
- Parties
- Applicant: Lerato Roberta Sengadi; Respondent: Robert Tsambo
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 November 2018
- Case Number
- 40344/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Reasons for Order Following Urgent Application
- Outcome
- The applicant is declared the lawful customary law wife of the deceased, but the application to interdict the funeral is declined due to competing public interests.
- Judges
- Mokgoathleng
- Legal Topics
- Customary Marriage, Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, Gender Equality, Handing Over Custom, Constitutional Development of Customary Law, Burial Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lerato Roberta Sengadi
Applicant
Robert Tsambo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Reasons for Order Following Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is the lawful customary law wife of the deceased.
- 2 Whether the custom of handing over the bride is an essential prerequisite for a valid customary law marriage under section 3(1) of the Recognition Act.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to arrange and conduct the burial of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant and the deceased had complied with the requirements of section 3(1) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, having negotiated and celebrated their marriage in accordance with living customary law. The insistence on the physical handing over of the bride as an indispensable prerequisite was rejected as inconsistent with constitutional values of equality and dignity. The court held that the custom of handing over the bride is not a lawful requirement for the existence of a customary law marriage where the statutory requirements have been met. The applicant was declared the lawful customary law wife of the deceased and entitled to burial rights....
Court Disposition
The applicant is declared the lawful customary law wife of the deceased, but the application to interdict the funeral is declined due to competing public interests.
Orders
- It is declared that the custom of handing over the bride is not a lawful requirement for the existence of a customary law marriage where section 3(1) of the Recognition Act has been complied with.
- The applicant is declared the customary law wife of the deceased.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment