Seoleseng and Another v Road Accident Fund (72837/2014) [2016] ZAGPPHC 848 (15 September 2016)
The court found that the first plaintiff failed to establish a legally enforceable contractual duty of support between himself and the deceased. While he received financial support, the evidence did not demonstrate that the relationship created obligations worthy of legal protection. Therefore, the first plaintiff's claim for loss of support in his personal capacity was dismissed. The minor child's claim for loss of support was accepted, with agreed contingency deductions applied to the actuarial calculations. The defendant was ordered to pay the quantified amounts for past and future loss of support to the first plaintiff in his representative capacity, as well as funeral expenses and...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 848
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mokulupi Simon Seoleseng; Plaintiff: Mogolosi Oesley Kasebedile; Defendant: The Road Accident Fund
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2016
- Case Number
- 72837/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum and Entitlement to Loss of Support
- Outcome
- The first plaintiff's claim for loss of support in his personal capacity is dismissed. The minor child's claim for loss of support is upheld with contingency deductions. The defendant is ordered to pay the quantified amounts, funeral expenses, and costs.
- Judges
- Fourie
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Support, Dependants Action, Contingency Deduction, Contractual Duty of Support
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mokulupi Simon Seoleseng
Plaintiff
Mogolosi Oesley Kasebedile
Plaintiff
The Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum and Entitlement to Loss of Support
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first plaintiff, as an unmarried partner, has a legally enforceable claim for loss of support in his personal capacity.
- 2 What contingencies should be applied to the minor child's claim for loss of support.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the first plaintiff failed to establish a legally enforceable contractual duty of support between himself and the deceased. While he received financial support, the evidence did not demonstrate that the relationship created obligations worthy of legal protection. Therefore, the first plaintiff's claim for loss of support in his personal capacity was dismissed. The minor child's claim for loss of support was accepted, with agreed contingency deductions applied to the actuarial calculations. The defendant was ordered to pay the quantified amounts for past and future loss of support to the first plaintiff in his representative capacity, as well as funeral expenses and...
Court Disposition
The first plaintiff's claim for loss of support in his personal capacity is dismissed. The minor child's claim for loss of support is upheld with contingency deductions. The defendant is ordered to pay the quantified amounts, funeral expenses, and costs.
Orders
- The defendant is ordered to pay to the first plaintiff, in his capacity as father and guardian of G A K, an amount of R 272,993.05, consisting of R 59,920.30 for past loss of support and R 213,072.75 for future loss of support.
- The defendant is ordered to pay interest on the above amounts at 10.5% per annum, from 14 days after the date of judgment to date of payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment