Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Sephton v Anglo Operations (PTY) LTD and Others (31271/2020) [2024] ZAGPJHC 90 (2 February 2024)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court, after considering the papers and submissions, found that the applicant had established that the appeal would have reasonable prospects of success as required by section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted to the full court of the division. The costs of the application for leave to appeal will be costs in the appeal.

Court disposition

Leave to appeal granted to the full court of the division. Costs will be costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal the judgment is granted to the full Court of this Division.
  • The costs will be the costs in the appeal.

02

Material facts

Parties

John Ross Sephton

Applicant Counsel: Adv CB Garvey

Anglo Operations (PTY) LTD

Respondent Counsel: Adv L Segeels-Ncube

Anglo American Platinum (PTY) LTD

Respondent Counsel: Adv L Segeels-Ncube

Mmaputi Jeanny Mello

Respondent Counsel: Adv L Segeels-Ncube

Piteau Associates

Respondent Counsel: Adv L Segeels-Ncube

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 18 May 2022.

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant contended that there are reasonable prospects that another court may come to a different conclusion and that the appeal should be heard by the full court. Various grounds for appeal were raised, but were not repeated in this judgment.
Respondent
The respondents opposed the application for leave to appeal, arguing that the applicant had not met the threshold required by section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act and that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, No. 10 of 2013

    Leave to appeal may be granted if the court is of the opinion that the appeal would have reasonable prospects of success or there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court, after considering the papers and submissions, found that the applicant had established that the appeal would have reasonable prospects of success as required by section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted to the full court of the division. The costs of the application for leave to appeal will be costs in the appeal.

Court disposition

Leave to appeal granted to the full court of the division. Costs will be costs in the appeal.

  • Leave to appeal the judgment is granted to the full Court of this Division.
  • The costs will be the costs in the appeal.

Source and reliance status

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Judgment

[2024] ZAGPJHC 90

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA(GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG)

REPUBLIC

OF SOUTH AFRICA

CASE NO: 31271/2020

(1)REPORTABLE: YES/NO

(2)OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO

(3)REVISED: YES/NO

In the matter between:

JOHN ROSS SEPHTON Applicant and

ANGLO OPERATIONS (PTY) LTD First Respondent

ANGLO AMERICAN PLATINUM (PTY) LTD

MMAPUTI

JEANNY MELLO

PITEAU

ASSOCIATES Second Respondent Third Respondent Fourth Respondent

JUDGMENT

(Leave to Appeal Application)

SENYATSI J:

[1] This is an application for leave to appeal the judgment handed down on 18 May 2022. The applicant has raised various grounds for appeal which will not be repeated in this judgment.

[2] Having considered the papers and the submissions made on behalf of the parties in this application for leave to appeal, I am of the view that the applicant has established that the appeal would succeed as required by section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, No; 10 of 2013.

ORDER

[15] The order is made in the following terms:

(a) Leave to appeal the judgment is granted to the full Court of this Division;

(b) The costs will be the costs in the appeal,

SENYATSI M L

JUDGE OF THE HIGH

COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION

Delivered: This judgment and order was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation to Parties / their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on Case Lines. The date of the order is deemed to be the 2 February 2024.

Appearances:

For the Applicant:

Adv CB Garvey

Instructed by:

Otto Krause Inc Attorneys

For the First to Third Respondent: Adv L Segeels-Ncube

Instructed by:

Webber Wentzel

Date Judgment Reserved:

3 November 2023

Date of Judgment:

2 February 2024

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Superior Courts Act, No. 10 of 2013

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.