Setlaba and Another v Ngcosane NO and Others (JR1501/15) [2019] ZALCJHB 8 (17 January 2019)
The applicants failed to comply with the statutory time limits for filing a review application under section 145(1)(a) of the Labour Relations Act and did not seek condonation for their late filing. They also failed to comply with the Labour Court Practice Manual regarding the timely filing of the record and readiness for hearing. No agreement to extend time was reached, nor was an extension granted by the Judge President. The applicants did not provide a formal application for condonation or a detailed explanation for the delay. In the absence of good cause and compliance with procedural requirements, the review application is deemed to have lapsed and must be struck from the roll.
- Citation
- [2019] ZALCJHB 8
- Parties
- Applicant: Ketlhwoecoeng Mildred Setlaba; Applicant: Thwala Carolina Letanta; Respondent: Mpe Ngcosane NO; Respondent: GPSSBC; Respondent: Department of Human Settlements: Free State
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2019
- Case Number
- JR1501/15
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application for Review of Arbitration Award Under Section 145(1)(a) of the Labour Relations Act
- Outcome
- The review application is struck from the roll due to non-compliance with statutory and procedural requirements.
- Judges
- L Raphulu
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Condonation, Practice Manual Compliance, Review of Arbitration Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ketlhwoecoeng Mildred Setlaba
Applicant
Thwala Carolina Letanta
Applicant
Mpe Ngcosane NO
Respondent
GPSSBC
Respondent
Department of Human Settlements: Free State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Review of Arbitration Award Under Section 145(1)(a) of the Labour Relations Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' review application was filed within the prescribed time period under the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the applicants complied with the Labour Court Practice Manual regarding filing of the record and readiness for hearing.
- 3 Whether condonation for late filing was sought and whether good cause for delay was shown.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to comply with the statutory time limits for filing a review application under section 145(1)(a) of the Labour Relations Act and did not seek condonation for their late filing. They also failed to comply with the Labour Court Practice Manual regarding the timely filing of the record and readiness for hearing. No agreement to extend time was reached, nor was an extension granted by the Judge President. The applicants did not provide a formal application for condonation or a detailed explanation for the delay. In the absence of good cause and compliance with procedural requirements, the review application is deemed to have lapsed and must be struck from the roll.
Court Disposition
The review application is struck from the roll due to non-compliance with statutory and procedural requirements.
Orders
- The review application is struck from the roll.
- No order is made as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment