Shangase v S (AR400/2019) [2023] ZAKZPHC 8 (27 January 2023)

Shangase v S (AR400/2019) [2023] ZAKZPHC 8 (27 January 2023)

The court found that the absence of a complete and reconstructable trial record made it impossible to properly exercise its appellate function and to ensure the appellant's right to a fair appeal. The available record consisted only of the judgment, sentence, indictment, summary of substantial facts, certain exhibits, and the application for leave to appeal, but lacked the evidence of witnesses and proceedings. Attempts to reconstruct the record failed, and the presiding judge and counsel could not assist due to missing notes. The court held that, in line with Constitutional Court and Supreme Court of Appeal authority, the conviction and sentence must be set aside where the record is...

Citation
[2023] ZAKZPHC 8
Parties
Appellant: Mpumelelo Sackey Shangase; Respondent: The State
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
27 January 2023
Case Number
AR400/2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal upheld; convictions and sentences set aside; matter remitted to the Director of Public Prosecutions for further consideration.
Judges
Henriques, Poyo Dlwati, Ploos van Amstel
Legal Topics
Fair Trial Rights, Appeal Record Sufficiency, Confession Admissibility, Record Reconstruction
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Fair Trial Rights Appeal Record Sufficiency Confession Admissibility Record Reconstruction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mpumelelo Sackey Shangase

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal record is sufficient for a fair determination of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a complete trial record prejudices the appellant's right to a fair appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the convictions and sentences can stand in the absence of a reconstructable record.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the absence of a complete and reconstructable trial record made it impossible to properly exercise its appellate function and to ensure the appellant's right to a fair appeal. The available record consisted only of the judgment, sentence, indictment, summary of substantial facts, certain exhibits, and the application for leave to appeal, but lacked the evidence of witnesses and proceedings. Attempts to reconstruct the record failed, and the presiding judge and counsel could not assist due to missing notes. The court held that, in line with Constitutional Court and Supreme Court of Appeal authority, the conviction and sentence must be set aside where the record is...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; convictions and sentences set aside; matter remitted to the Director of Public Prosecutions for further consideration.

Orders

  • The appeal against conviction and sentence is upheld. The convictions and sentences imposed are set aside.
  • The matter is remitted to the Director of Public Prosecutions for further consideration.