Shaw v Vertue and Others (5217/2019) [2020] ZAWCHC 195 (7 December 2020)
The court found that the purchaser's obligation under the deed of sale was to pay the full purchase price to the seller in cash against transfer. The conveyancer was appointed by the purchaser and there was no evidence of a mandate from the seller authorising the conveyancer to act as his agent for receipt of payment. Payment into the conveyancer's trust account did not discharge the purchaser's obligation to the seller, especially since the funds were paid into a fraudulent account due to the conveyancer's error. The purchaser's defence that she was not liable was rejected, as the deed of sale did not alter her primary obligation. The court held that the purchaser remains liable for the...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAWCHC 195
- Parties
- Applicant: Brain Shaw; Respondent: Lizl Vertue; Respondent: Gous Vertue & Associates Incorporated; Respondent: ABSA Home Loans Guarantee Co (RF) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds, Cape Town
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 2020
- Case Number
- 5217/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Payment of Purchase Price
- Outcome
- Application granted. Purchaser ordered to pay the outstanding balance of the purchase price to the seller, with interest and costs. Ancillary orders for cancellation and re-transfer of property if payment is not made.
- Judges
- Fortuin
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Immovable Property, Mandate and Agency, Payment Obligation, Role of Conveyancer, Security for Purchase Price
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brain Shaw
Applicant
Lizl Vertue
Respondent
Gous Vertue & Associates Incorporated
Respondent
ABSA Home Loans Guarantee Co (RF) (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds, Cape Town
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Payment of Purchase Price
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the purchaser discharged her obligation to pay the purchase price by paying into the conveyancer's trust account.
- 2 Whether the conveyancer was authorised by the seller to receive and disburse the purchase price on his behalf.
- 3 Whether the purchaser remains liable to the seller for the unpaid portion of the purchase price after payment was made to a fraudulent account.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the purchaser's obligation under the deed of sale was to pay the full purchase price to the seller in cash against transfer. The conveyancer was appointed by the purchaser and there was no evidence of a mandate from the seller authorising the conveyancer to act as his agent for receipt of payment. Payment into the conveyancer's trust account did not discharge the purchaser's obligation to the seller, especially since the funds were paid into a fraudulent account due to the conveyancer's error. The purchaser's defence that she was not liable was rejected, as the deed of sale did not alter her primary obligation. The court held that the purchaser remains liable for the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Purchaser ordered to pay the outstanding balance of the purchase price to the seller, with interest and costs. Ancillary orders for cancellation and re-transfer of property if payment is not made.
Orders
- The purchaser (first respondent) is to pay to the seller (applicant) the amount of R3,315,992.74.
- Interest on the aforesaid amount at the prescribed rate of 10.25% per annum from 12 October 2018 until date of payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment