Shevel v Alson Development Sea Point (Pty) Ltd and Another (A77/2020) [2021] ZAWCHC 7; [2021] 2 All SA 260 (WCC) (27 January 2021)
The court found that the appellant was in unlawful occupation of the property, having defaulted on rental payments and after lawful cancellation of the lease. The Magistrate's assessment of the appellant's financial position, while incorrectly describing hand-outs from friends as earnings, was not a material misdirection. The appellant had failed to take reasonable steps to secure alternative accommodation and had enjoyed a year of rent-free occupation. His claims of personal safety risks and imminent homelessness were unsupported by concrete evidence and did not warrant indefinite suspension of the eviction order. The lockdown regulations did not require further delay, as the appellant...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAWCHC 7
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel Shevel; Respondent: Alson Development Sea Point (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The City of Cape Town
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2021
- Case Number
- A77/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Eviction Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; eviction order confirmed with new date for vacating premises; costs awarded against appellant.
- Judges
- P.A.L. Gamble, B.P. Mantame
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act, Unlawful Occupation, Just and Equitable Order, Lockdown Regulations, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Shevel
Appellant
Alson Development Sea Point (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
The City of Cape Town
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Eviction Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a fair trial in the Magistrate's Court.
- 2 Whether the Magistrate erred in assessing the appellant's earning capacity and ability to secure alternative accommodation.
- 3 Whether the eviction order should be suspended due to the appellant's risk of homelessness and personal safety concerns.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant was in unlawful occupation of the property, having defaulted on rental payments and after lawful cancellation of the lease. The Magistrate's assessment of the appellant's financial position, while incorrectly describing hand-outs from friends as earnings, was not a material misdirection. The appellant had failed to take reasonable steps to secure alternative accommodation and had enjoyed a year of rent-free occupation. His claims of personal safety risks and imminent homelessness were unsupported by concrete evidence and did not warrant indefinite suspension of the eviction order. The lockdown regulations did not require further delay, as the appellant...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; eviction order confirmed with new date for vacating premises; costs awarded against appellant.
Orders
- The application to lead new evidence on appeal is dismissed with costs on the party and party scale.
- The appellant is to pay the costs of opposition incurred by the first respondent in relation to each of the Third Party Notices issued by the appellant, such costs to be taxed on the party and party scale.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment