Shomang v Motsose N.O. and Others (6990/2022) [2022] ZAGPPHC 441; 2022 (5) SA 602 (GP) (24 May 2022)
The court held that the applicant's right to occupy the family home, arising from a family rights agreement and long-term occupation, deserves protection under the Constitution and relevant statutes. The property was historically allocated under apartheid legislation, and subsequent administrative processes recognised the family home arrangement, appointing a custodian for the benefit of the family. The failure to register the applicant's rights was an administrative oversight, and the current executor's claim to sole ownership conflicts with the collective rights established by the family agreement. The court found that property law must be developed to accommodate such customary law...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPPHC 441
- Parties
- Applicant: Irene Shomang; Respondent: Isaac Motsose N.O.; Respondent: Director-General of Department of Human Settlement, Gauteng Province; Respondent: MEC of the Department of Human Settlement, Gauteng Province; Respondent: City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds: Johannesburg; Respondent: Master of the High Court: Johannesburg
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2022
- Case Number
- 6990/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Unopposed Motion Roll; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; orders issued in favour of the applicant.
- Judges
- du Plessis
- Legal Topics
- Customary Law Property Rights, Security of Tenure, Section 25 Constitution, Family Home Agreements, Deeds Registries Act, Intestate Succession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irene Shomang
Applicant
Isaac Motsose N.O.
Respondent
Director-General of Department of Human Settlement, Gauteng Province
Respondent
MEC of the Department of Human Settlement, Gauteng Province
Respondent
City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds: Johannesburg
Respondent
Master of the High Court: Johannesburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Unopposed Motion Roll; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's right to occupy the family home, arising from a family rights agreement, should be protected over the registered ownership of the property.
- 2 Whether the Registrar of Deeds should be directed to transfer the property into the applicant's name as custodian, with a caveat noting its status as a family home.
- 3 How property law should be developed to accommodate customary law rights in urban family homes under the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant's right to occupy the family home, arising from a family rights agreement and long-term occupation, deserves protection under the Constitution and relevant statutes. The property was historically allocated under apartheid legislation, and subsequent administrative processes recognised the family home arrangement, appointing a custodian for the benefit of the family. The failure to register the applicant's rights was an administrative oversight, and the current executor's claim to sole ownership conflicts with the collective rights established by the family agreement. The court found that property law must be developed to accommodate such customary law...
Court Disposition
Application granted; orders issued in favour of the applicant.
Orders
- It is declared that the property known as ERF [....] held in Title Deed No: T[....] is subject to a family rights agreement imposed by adjudication judgment dated 29 April 2016.
- The Registrar of Deeds is ordered to transfer the property held in Title Deed No: T[....], currently registered in the name of Johannes Moloi, into the name of Irene Shomang as custodian of the family house, with a caveat on the title deed noting its status as a family home.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment