Shrives N.O and Others v Sammaritano and Others (2023-120777) [2024] ZAGPJHC 59 (9 January 2024)
The applicants failed to establish a prima facie right to discharge water via the drainage pipe, either under common law or the applicable municipal land use scheme. The common law obligation applies only to the natural flow from undeveloped land, and the applicants' property is developed. There was no evidence that the municipality expressed the required opinion or authorised the connection to the stormwater system. The risk of harm to the applicants was not sufficiently established, as alternative drainage solutions existed and the inconvenience suffered did not amount to serious harm. The balance of convenience did not favour the applicants, as the respondents experienced severe...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPJHC 59
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Sean Shrives N.O; Applicant: Carrie Leigh Cooper N.O; Applicant: William Glen Milford McKenzie N.O; Respondent: Anna Sammaritano; Respondent: Silvestro Sammaritano; Respondent: City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 January 2024
- Case Number
- 2023-120777
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Interim Interdict Pending Final Determination of Rights and Obligations.
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- G S Myburgh
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Natural Flow of Water, Stormwater Drainage, Praedial Servitude, Municipal Land Use Scheme
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Sean Shrives N.O
Applicant
Carrie Leigh Cooper N.O
Applicant
William Glen Milford McKenzie N.O
Applicant
Anna Sammaritano
Respondent
Silvestro Sammaritano
Respondent
City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interim Interdict Pending Final Determination of Rights and Obligations.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have a prima facie right to discharge water from their property onto the respondents' property via a drainage pipe.
- 2 Whether the requirements for interim interdictory relief are satisfied.
- 3 Whether the applicants have a common law or statutory right to the relief sought.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to establish a prima facie right to discharge water via the drainage pipe, either under common law or the applicable municipal land use scheme. The common law obligation applies only to the natural flow from undeveloped land, and the applicants' property is developed. There was no evidence that the municipality expressed the required opinion or authorised the connection to the stormwater system. The risk of harm to the applicants was not sufficiently established, as alternative drainage solutions existed and the inconvenience suffered did not amount to serious harm. The balance of convenience did not favour the applicants, as the respondents experienced severe...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment