Sibiya v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation And Arbitration and Others (D737/13) [2015] ZALCD 37; [2015] 10 BLLR 1060 (LC) (12 June 2015)
The court found that although the applicant's dismissal was substantively unfair, the circumstances surrounding the dismissal, including the applicant's post-dismissal conduct and serious allegations against senior management, rendered a continued employment relationship intolerable and not reasonably practicable. The applicant's failure to testify and his involvement in wild and scandalous allegations against the employer confirmed the breakdown of trust. The court held that reinstatement was not a fair or reasonable remedy and dismissed the review application for reinstatement.
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCD 37
- Parties
- Applicant: Sithembiso Reginald Sibiya; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: First National Bank (FNB); Respondent: Jabulani Ngwane (Commissioner)
- Court
- Labour Court Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2015
- Case Number
- D737/13
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review Application Regarding Reinstatement After Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Review application for reinstatement dismissed. Costs awarded against the applicant.
- Judges
- Cele
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Reinstatement, Compensation, Breakdown of Trust, Section 193 Lra, Review of Arbitration Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sithembiso Reginald Sibiya
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
First National Bank (FNB)
Respondent
Jabulani Ngwane (Commissioner)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review Application Regarding Reinstatement After Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to reinstatement as a remedy for unfair dismissal.
- 2 Whether the circumstances surrounding the dismissal render continued employment intolerable or impracticable.
- 3 Whether the arbitration award should be reviewed and corrected to substitute compensation with reinstatement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the applicant's dismissal was substantively unfair, the circumstances surrounding the dismissal, including the applicant's post-dismissal conduct and serious allegations against senior management, rendered a continued employment relationship intolerable and not reasonably practicable. The applicant's failure to testify and his involvement in wild and scandalous allegations against the employer confirmed the breakdown of trust. The court held that reinstatement was not a fair or reasonable remedy and dismissed the review application for reinstatement.
Court Disposition
Review application for reinstatement dismissed. Costs awarded against the applicant.
Orders
- The applicant’s review application on reinstatement is dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the costs thereof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment