Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich and VA Technologie AG (49/LM/Jun05) [2005] ZACT 55 (15 August 2005)
- Citation
- [2005] ZACT 55
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- N Manoim, Y Carrim, M Mokuena
- Case number
- 49/LM/Jun05
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- N Manoim, Y Carrim, M Mokuena
- Case number
- 49/LM/Jun05
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the merger between Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich and VA Technologie AG would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the identified markets in South Africa. The combined market shares in the relevant segments—high voltage products and protective relays—were found to be low, with the increment resulting from VA Tech’s share being minor. The market remains competitive with several other players. No significant horizontal or vertical competition concerns were identified. Furthermore, there were no public interest concerns that would warrant prohibition or conditions. The Tribunal therefore approved the merger unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The merger between Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich and VA Technologie AG is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich
Applicant Counsel: V KoovejeeVA Technologie AG
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Combined Market Share in Energy Automation and Information Systems: ZAR 24.4
- Combined Market Share in Protective Relays: ZAR 19.4
- Incremental Market Share From VA Tech: ZAR 4.4
03
Procedural history
Posture
Large Merger / Merger Clearance Decision
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger between Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich and VA Technologie AG will substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant South African markets.
- 02
Whether there are any public interest concerns arising from the merger.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Siemens argued that the acquisition of VA Tech would complement its existing product portfolio and strengthen its activities in regions where it has a relatively weak market position. The parties submitted that the overlap in South Africa is limited and that the transaction would not negatively impact competition.
- Respondent
- VA Tech did not oppose the merger and concurred with the applicant's submissions regarding limited overlap and lack of significant competition concerns. The Competition Commission, acting as respondent, found that market shares post-merger would remain low and that sufficient competitors would remain in the affected markets.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Commission’s Report, page 11
Market share analysis is a key factor in assessing the competitive impact of a merger, but must be considered alongside the presence of other competitors and market dynamics.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the merger between Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich and VA Technologie AG would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the identified markets in South Africa. The combined market shares in the relevant segments—high voltage products and protective relays—were found to be low, with the increment resulting from VA Tech’s share being minor. The market remains competitive with several other players. No significant horizontal or vertical competition concerns were identified. Furthermore, there were no public interest concerns that would warrant prohibition or conditions. The Tribunal therefore approved the merger unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that VA Tech is a relatively small player in the South African market for energy automation and information systems, and the change in competitive landscape is not significant.
- The Tribunal agreed with the Commission’s approach of not making a definitive finding on the relevant markets, given the lack of substantial competition concerns.
Court disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
- The merger between Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich and VA Technologie AG is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH
AFRICA
Case no: 49/LM/Jun05
In The Large Merger Between:
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Ãsterreich Acquiring Firm
And
VA Technologie AG Target Firm
Reasons for Decision
Approval
On 03 August 2005, the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate approving the transaction between Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Ãsterreich and VA Technologie AG. The reasons for this decision follow.
The Transaction
The primary acquiring firm is Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Ãsterreich (âSiemens AG Ãsterreichâ), the Austrian subsidiary of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (âSiemens AGâ).1 Siemens has several subsidiaries around the world. In South Africa, Siemens conducts its business through Siemens Limited South Africa (âSiemens SAâ). Siemens SA has the following subsidiaries in South Africa: Siemens Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd, Siemens Real Estate Management (Pty) Ltd, Siemens Demag Delavel Turbomachinery (Pty) Ltd and Siemed Services (Pty) Ltd. Siemens AG and its subsidiaries will be collectively referred to as âSiemensâ.
The primary target firm is VA Technologie AG (âVA Techâ), an Austrian stock corporation listed on the Vienna Stock Exchange. VA Tech has a number of subsidiaries worldwide and in South Africa its subsidiaries include: Voest Alpine Industries (SA) (Pty) Ltd, Voest Alpine Industrial Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd, VA Tech International (Pty) Ltd, Fuchs Sytemtechnik (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Fuchs Thermal Technology (Pty) Ltd.
In terms of the transaction, Siemens AG Ãsterreich is acquiring the entire issued share capital of VA Tech through a public tender offer and will post merger, have sole control over VA Tech. According to the parties, the acquisition will enable Siemens to complement its existing product portfolio to benefit its customers. In addition, Siemens will be able to strengthen its activities in regions where it has a relatively weak market position.
The Merging partiesâ activities
Siemens and VA Tech operate throughout the world in a number of similar sectors. 2 However, in South Africa, there is a limited amount of overlap in their activities.
In South Africa, Siemens is involved in information and communication, mobile telephony, information technology, medical solutions, transportation systems, building technologies, logistics and assembly systems, automation and drives, industrial services and solutions, components, power transmission and distribution.
VA Techâs South African activities are focused mainly on mechanical engineering, in particular in the field of metallurgy. It is however, also to a limited extent involved in the power transmission and distribution market.
Impact on competition
Horizontal Assessment
In South Africa, both merging parties operate broadly in the market for power transmission and distribution. The Commission found that in this market there are however, only overlaps in respect of the market for high voltage products and the market for network automation and information systems.
According to the Commission and merging parties,3 high voltage products include components which when combined will form a control panel referred to as a switchgear. Several switchgears combined will form a substation. A switchgear comprises various combinations of components including: circuit breakers, disconnectors, instrument transformers, reactors, arrestors and bushings. It should be noted that in the high voltage products market, VA Tech has a limited presence in that it does not produce arrestors and bushings.
Network and information systems comprise products, systems and solutions that are used to control electricity and to register the control- and use of electrical energy. Automation products and information systems are used both in high voltage and medium voltage networks. This market can be further segmented into the following categories:
network automation, including substation automation and telecontrol; protective relays; and
energy information systems.
According to the Commission, in the market for network automation and information systems, the merging partiesâ activities overlap only in respect of protective relays, as VA Tech is not involved in the other narrow segments. The Commission considered the effect of the transaction on the market shares of the merging parties in the market for high voltage products, and concluded that:
â[t]he market shares are fairly low and are unlikely to raise any serious competition concerns. In addition, the market remains competitive with several other competitors competing with the merged entity.4
In the market for energy automation and information systems, the merged entity would have a combined market share of 24.4%, and in the narrower market segment of protective relays, the merged entity would have a market share of 19,4%. In both the broad and narrow segments, the increment is 4.4% (VA Techâs pre-merger market share). In the Commissionâs view,
ââ¦VA Tech is a relatively small player in this market again, and accordingly, the change in the competitive landscape is not as significant as to pose any serious competition concerns. In addition the market remains competitive, as there are several players competing in this product categoryâ¦.â 5
The Commission was of the view that the merger did not raise any serious competition concerns from a horizontal perspective. The Commission was also of the view that there were no serious vertical concerns arising from the merger.
Without making a definitive finding on the relevant markets, we agree with the Commission that the transaction, as placed before us, will not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the markets identified above. Furthermore there are no public interest concerns, which would alter our view.
Conclusion
We agree with the Commissionâs recommendation that the transaction be unconditionally approved.
15 August 2005
N Manoim Date
Concurring: Y Carrim and M Mokuena
For the merging parties: V Koovejee (Deneys Reitz)
For the Commission: S Nunkoo (Mergers and Acquisitions)
1 Siemens AG is lon the German Exchange, the Swiss Stock Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange. Its shareholding is widely held with no single entity controlling party.
2 For a complete description of the worldwide activities of both Siemens and VA Tech, see Pages 62-66 of the record.
3 See Commissionâs Report and merging partiesâ Competitiveness Report.
4 Page 11 of the Commissionâs Report.
5 Page 11 of the Commissionâs Report.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.