Simbine and Others v Nobantu Steel (Pty) Ltd and Another (118674/2023) [2024] ZAGPJHC 781 (21 August 2024)
The court found that the respondents failed to comply with the payment terms set out in the acknowledgment of debt and undertaking to pay. The respondents' defence was limited to bald denials and did not constitute a genuine dispute of fact. The allocation of legal fees was clearly provided for in the acknowledgment of debt, and the respondents did not provide any substantive evidence to challenge the applicants' calculation of the outstanding amount. The court held that the applicants were entitled to the relief sought, including monetary judgment for the outstanding sum, transfer of shares to perfect the pledge and cession, delivery of book debts, and costs. The respondents' version was...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPJHC 781
- Parties
- Applicant: Akani Simbine; Applicant: Peet van Zyl; Applicant: Wayde van Niekerk; Respondent: Nobantu Steel (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Siziwe Khumalo
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2024
- Case Number
- 118674/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Monetary Judgment Application / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted in full; monetary judgment and ancillary relief awarded to the applicants.
- Judges
- TP Mudau
- Legal Topics
- Acknowledgment of Debt, Pledge and Cession of Shares, Book Debt Cession, Summary Judgment, Suretyship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Akani Simbine
Applicant
Peet van Zyl
Applicant
Wayde van Niekerk
Applicant
Nobantu Steel (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Siziwe Khumalo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Monetary Judgment Application / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents are liable to pay the outstanding sum under the acknowledgment of debt.
- 2 Whether the respondents have raised a genuine dispute of fact regarding the amount owed.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to ancillary relief to perfect the pledge and cession of shares and book debts.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents failed to comply with the payment terms set out in the acknowledgment of debt and undertaking to pay. The respondents' defence was limited to bald denials and did not constitute a genuine dispute of fact. The allocation of legal fees was clearly provided for in the acknowledgment of debt, and the respondents did not provide any substantive evidence to challenge the applicants' calculation of the outstanding amount. The court held that the applicants were entitled to the relief sought, including monetary judgment for the outstanding sum, transfer of shares to perfect the pledge and cession, delivery of book debts, and costs. The respondents' version was...
Court Disposition
Application granted in full; monetary judgment and ancillary relief awarded to the applicants.
Orders
- The first and second respondents, jointly and severally, are ordered to pay the applicants the sum of R1 061 750.00 together with interest at the agreed rate of 25.9% per annum from date of failure to pay until date of final payment, within seven days.
- Failing payment, the second respondent is compelled to transfer the shareholding held by her in the first respondent to the applicants to perfect the pledge and cession of shares.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment