Singo and Others v Carradale Estates CC (LCC63R/04, LCC50/04) [2007] ZALCC 1 (31 January 2007)

Singo and Others v Carradale Estates CC (LCC63R/04, LCC50/04) [2007] ZALCC 1 (31 January 2007)

The court held that the magistrate's order, though inadequately motivated, was correct in the circumstances. The applicants had resided on the property free of charge since January 2000 and had not offered to pay rent. The statutory requirements under Section 10(1)(b) were not the sole determinants; the court was obliged to consider all relevant factors to ensure the eviction was just and equitable. The relations between the parties had been normal until economic hardship necessitated changes. The applicants were not entitled to remain indefinitely without payment, and the state, not the respondent, was responsible for providing housing. The eviction order was confirmed, subject to...

Citation
[2007] ZALCC 1
Parties
Applicant: Wilson Singo; Applicant: Tsaikani Brenda Mabasa; Applicant: Frans Chico Mashau; Applicant: Tsakani Sophy Malulebe; Applicant: Rossina Mashiba Mkgandi; Applicant: Esther Mangane; Applicant: Mthavani Elsia Baloyi Mashao; Respondent: Carradale Estates CC
Court
Land Claims Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
31 January 2007
Case Number
LCC63R/04, LCC50/04
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Eviction Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; eviction orders confirmed subject to conditions.
Judges
F C Bam
Legal Topics
Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Eviction, Just and Equitable, Termination of Right of Residence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilson Singo

Applicant

Tsaikani Brenda Mabasa

Applicant

Frans Chico Mashau

Applicant

Tsakani Sophy Malulebe

Applicant

Rossina Mashiba Mkgandi

Applicant

Esther Mangane

Applicant

Mthavani Elsia Baloyi Mashao

Applicant

Carradale Estates CC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Eviction Order

  1. 1 Whether the requirements of Section 10(1)(b) of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act were satisfied for eviction.
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate properly considered all relevant statutory factors, including those under Section 8, before granting eviction.
  3. 3 Whether the eviction order was just and equitable in all the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the magistrate's order, though inadequately motivated, was correct in the circumstances. The applicants had resided on the property free of charge since January 2000 and had not offered to pay rent. The statutory requirements under Section 10(1)(b) were not the sole determinants; the court was obliged to consider all relevant factors to ensure the eviction was just and equitable. The relations between the parties had been normal until economic hardship necessitated changes. The applicants were not entitled to remain indefinitely without payment, and the state, not the respondent, was responsible for providing housing. The eviction order was confirmed, subject to...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; eviction orders confirmed subject to conditions.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The eviction orders of the magistrate's court are confirmed, subject to updated Probation Officer's report on the present circumstances of the parties, especially regarding alternative accommodation.