Sithebe and Others v Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd and Another (LCC38/2018) [2019] ZALCC 7 (28 May 2019)
The court found that the applicants' status as labour tenants had not been determined and, therefore, they could not claim statutory rights as labour tenants at this stage. Their rights to reside and graze cattle on the farm were personal rights arising from the owner's consent, not from legislation. The applicants failed to provide credible evidence of entitlement to graze cattle outside the allocated camp and withheld material information regarding the number of cattle and prior agreements. The application was not urgent, as the dispossession occurred years prior and no adequate explanation for delay was provided. The relief sought was found to be unenforceable and the application was...
- Citation
- [2019] ZALCC 7
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Bhiki Sithebe; Applicant: Shadrack Petros Tshabalala; Applicant: Vukani Khumalo; Applicant: Bheki Khumalo; Respondent: Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Director General for the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2019
- Case Number
- LCC38/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Determination of Labour Tenant Status
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- T M Ncube
- Legal Topics
- Labour Tenancy, Interim Interdict, Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Personal Rights of Occupiers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Bhiki Sithebe
Applicant
Shadrack Petros Tshabalala
Applicant
Vukani Khumalo
Applicant
Bheki Khumalo
Applicant
Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Director General for the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Determination of Labour Tenant Status
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to interim interdict relief pending determination of their status as labour tenants.
- 2 Whether the applicants have enforceable rights to graze cattle beyond the allocated camp.
- 3 Whether the application is urgent and whether the relief sought is enforceable.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' status as labour tenants had not been determined and, therefore, they could not claim statutory rights as labour tenants at this stage. Their rights to reside and graze cattle on the farm were personal rights arising from the owner's consent, not from legislation. The applicants failed to provide credible evidence of entitlement to graze cattle outside the allocated camp and withheld material information regarding the number of cattle and prior agreements. The application was not urgent, as the dispossession occurred years prior and no adequate explanation for delay was provided. The relief sought was found to be unenforceable and the application was...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Applicants are jointly ordered to pay the costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment