Sithole v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (Application for Leave to Appeal) (JR845/2021) [2025] ZALCJHB 165 (8 May 2025)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The main judgment had already determined that her dismissal was substantively fair, based on her absence from work without permission and failure to notify her supervisor. The grievance she raised against her supervisor was found to have no bearing on the dismissal. The court was not persuaded that there was any compelling reason for the Labour Appeal Court to hear the matter. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2025] ZALCJHB 165
- Parties
- Applicant: Nonhlanhla Octavia Sithole; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Nadia Sithole; Respondent: Enviroserv Waste Management (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 May 2025
- Case Number
- JR845/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Review Application
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Judges
- F.I Baloyi
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Review of Arbitration Award, Leave to Appeal, Absence Without Permission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nonhlanhla Octavia Sithole
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Nadia Sithole
Respondent
Enviroserv Waste Management (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the judgment dismissing her review application.
- 2 Whether there is any compelling reason for the Labour Appeal Court to hear the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The main judgment had already determined that her dismissal was substantively fair, based on her absence from work without permission and failure to notify her supervisor. The grievance she raised against her supervisor was found to have no bearing on the dismissal. The court was not persuaded that there was any compelling reason for the Labour Appeal Court to hear the matter. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment