S.J.J.W v Road Accident Fund (19574/2017) [2023] ZAWCHC 25 (8 February 2023)
The court held that the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for past medical expenses, including those paid by his medical aid scheme, Momentum. The principle of res inter alios acta and established case law dictate that medical aid benefits are collateral and must be disregarded in the calculation of damages. The defendant's August 2022 directive purporting to exclude reimbursement of medical aid payments was found to be unlawful and inconsistent with section 17 of the Road Accident Fund Act. The court found no basis to delay finalisation of the matter pending possible appeals, as the law currently stands in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant's liability is unaffected by...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAWCHC 25
- Parties
- Plaintiff: S[...] J[...] J[...] W[...]; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2023
- Case Number
- 19574/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the full quantum of damages, including past medical expenses paid by his medical aid scheme, and to provide an undertaking for future medical costs. Costs are awarded to the plaintiff.
- Judges
- P. S. Van Zyl
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Medical Aid Indemnity, Quantum of Damages, Collateral Benefits, Res Inter Alios Acta
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S[...] J[...] J[...] W[...]
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Road Accident Fund is liable to compensate the plaintiff for past medical expenses paid by his medical aid scheme.
- 2 Whether the defendant may deduct amounts paid by the plaintiff's medical aid from the quantum payable for past medical expenses.
- 3 Whether the defendant's August 2022 directive refusing reimbursement of medical aid payments is lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for past medical expenses, including those paid by his medical aid scheme, Momentum. The principle of res inter alios acta and established case law dictate that medical aid benefits are collateral and must be disregarded in the calculation of damages. The defendant's August 2022 directive purporting to exclude reimbursement of medical aid payments was found to be unlawful and inconsistent with section 17 of the Road Accident Fund Act. The court found no basis to delay finalisation of the matter pending possible appeals, as the law currently stands in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant's liability is unaffected by...
Court Disposition
The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the full quantum of damages, including past medical expenses paid by his medical aid scheme, and to provide an undertaking for future medical costs. Costs are awarded to the plaintiff.
Orders
- The Defendant shall be liable for 100% of the Plaintiff’s damages as set out in the order.
- The Defendant shall pay R4,273,170.00 to the Plaintiff’s attorneys in respect of loss of income and general damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment