SL and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (2016/ 01352) [2016] ZAGPJHC 47 (26 February 2016)
The court found that the applicants, four Thai nationals detained at Lindela pending deportation, were not properly dealt with under the Prevention and Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act 7 of 2013, despite credible suspicion that they may be victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation. The respondents failed to apply the appropriate statutory framework and did not provide adequate explanation for the prolonged detention or delay in deportation. The court held that the state has a positive constitutional duty to protect suspected victims of trafficking and that the applicants must be released from Lindela and placed in a designated place of safety, with their status to be assessed...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPJHC 47
- Parties
- Applicant: S L; Applicant: T H; Applicant: C D; Applicant: C K; Respondent: Minister of Home Affairs; Respondent: Minister of Police; Respondent: Bosasa Group of Companies t/a Lindela Repatriation Facility; Amicus: Commission for Gender Equality
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2016
- Case Number
- 2016/ 01352
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Relief and Final Determination in Urgent Motion Court
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; applicants released from Lindela and placed in a place of safety pending assessment under the Prevention and Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act; costs reserved.
- Judges
- Modiba
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking in Persons, Prevention and Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act, Immigration Detention, Constitutional Rights Protection, Interim Relief, Judicial Review of Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S L
Applicant
T H
Applicant
C D
Applicant
C K
Applicant
Minister of Home Affairs
Respondent
Minister of Police
Respondent
Bosasa Group of Companies t/a Lindela Repatriation Facility
Respondent
Commission for Gender Equality
Amicus
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Relief and Final Determination in Urgent Motion Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the continued detention of the applicants at Lindela is lawful and justified.
- 2 Whether the applicants are victims of trafficking in persons and entitled to protection under the Prevention and Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act 7 of 2013.
- 3 Whether the respondents fulfilled their constitutional and statutory duties in dealing with suspected victims of trafficking.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, four Thai nationals detained at Lindela pending deportation, were not properly dealt with under the Prevention and Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act 7 of 2013, despite credible suspicion that they may be victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation. The respondents failed to apply the appropriate statutory framework and did not provide adequate explanation for the prolonged detention or delay in deportation. The court held that the state has a positive constitutional duty to protect suspected victims of trafficking and that the applicants must be released from Lindela and placed in a designated place of safety, with their status to be assessed...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; applicants released from Lindela and placed in a place of safety pending assessment under the Prevention and Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act; costs reserved.
Orders
- The matter is declared urgent and forms of service are dispensed with.
- The applicants are to be released from Lindela upon receipt of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment