Smith v Long (2290/2007) [2009] ZAECPEHC 8 (12 February 2009)

Smith v Long (2290/2007) [2009] ZAECPEHC 8 (12 February 2009)

The court found that the plaintiff validly cancelled the agreement of sale due to substantial defects in the property. The defendant conceded the validity of the cancellation and agreed to repay the purchase price against retransfer of the property. The plaintiff was entitled to mora interest on the purchase price from a date determined by the court, as the defendant had not pleaded any set-off for the value of occupation. The court rejected the defendant's argument that occupational interest should reduce the claim for mora interest, holding that the contractual occupational interest did not equate to the value of occupation for purposes of set-off. The court determined that mora...

Citation
[2009] ZAECPEHC 8
Parties
Plaintiff: Ivor Parkin Smith; Defendant: Wendy Margaret Long
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 February 2009
Case Number
2290/2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; agreement of sale validly cancelled; repayment of purchase price and ancillary relief granted; defendant liable for mora interest from 15 February 2008.
Judges
Kroon
Legal Topics
Mora Interest, Repayment of Purchase Price, Contract Cancellation, Occupational Interest, Transfer Duty Refund
Land and Property Civil Procedure Mora Interest Repayment of Purchase Price Contract Cancellation Occupational Interest Transfer Duty Refund

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ivor Parkin Smith

Plaintiff

Wendy Margaret Long

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff validly cancelled the agreement of sale for the property.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to repayment of the purchase price and ancillary relief.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to mora interest on the purchase price paid after cancellation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff validly cancelled the agreement of sale due to substantial defects in the property. The defendant conceded the validity of the cancellation and agreed to repay the purchase price against retransfer of the property. The plaintiff was entitled to mora interest on the purchase price from a date determined by the court, as the defendant had not pleaded any set-off for the value of occupation. The court rejected the defendant's argument that occupational interest should reduce the claim for mora interest, holding that the contractual occupational interest did not equate to the value of occupation for purposes of set-off. The court determined that mora...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; agreement of sale validly cancelled; repayment of purchase price and ancillary relief granted; defendant liable for mora interest from 15 February 2008.

Orders

  • It is declared that the written agreement of sale concluded between the parties on 24 January 2007, as amended by the addendum dated 6 February 2007, was validly cancelled by the plaintiff.
  • The defendant is directed to repay the purchase price of R2,950,000.00 to the plaintiff against registration of the retransfer of the property from the plaintiff to the defendant, which retransfer shall occur by no later than 1 July 2009 at the defendant's cost.