Smith v MEC for Health, Province of KwaZulu-Natal (3826/12) [2016] ZAKZPHC 68 (2 August 2016)

Smith v MEC for Health, Province of KwaZulu-Natal (3826/12) [2016] ZAKZPHC 68 (2 August 2016)

The court found that the anaesthetist negligently administered formalin to Mrs Smith, causing her to suffer enduring pain, severe nosebleeds, vomiting, weight loss, inability to eat normally, and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. The evidence of the plaintiff and her experts was preferred over the defendant's, particularly regarding the causation of her ongoing medical and psychological problems. The defendant's failure to admit liability timeously and to properly discover hospital records was inexcusable and prejudiced the plaintiff. The court accepted the actuarial and expert evidence supporting future medical and dietary expenses. General damages were assessed at R340,000, and a...

Citation
[2016] ZAKZPHC 68
Parties
Plaintiff: Isabella Brink Beyers Smith; Defendant: MEC for Health, Province of KwaZulu-Natal
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
2 August 2016
Case Number
3826/12
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant is ordered to pay damages and costs.
Judges
Lopes
Legal Topics
Medical Negligence, Personal Injury, Quantum of Damages, Hospital Protocol, Expert Evidence
Delict Civil Procedure Medical Negligence Personal Injury Quantum of Damages Hospital Protocol Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isabella Brink Beyers Smith

Plaintiff

MEC for Health, Province of KwaZulu-Natal

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the administration of formalin to Mrs Smith negligent and causative of her injuries?.
  2. 2 What are the medical and psychological consequences suffered by Mrs Smith as a result of the formalin ingestion?.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for Mrs Smith's pain, suffering, and future medical expenses?.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the anaesthetist negligently administered formalin to Mrs Smith, causing her to suffer enduring pain, severe nosebleeds, vomiting, weight loss, inability to eat normally, and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. The evidence of the plaintiff and her experts was preferred over the defendant's, particularly regarding the causation of her ongoing medical and psychological problems. The defendant's failure to admit liability timeously and to properly discover hospital records was inexcusable and prejudiced the plaintiff. The court accepted the actuarial and expert evidence supporting future medical and dietary expenses. General damages were assessed at R340,000, and a...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant is ordered to pay damages and costs.

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of R890,741.
  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's taxed or agreed costs on the attorney and client scale, including all reserved costs except for the costs of adjournment on 16, 18, and 19 May 2016, which each party will bear themselves.