Smith v Smith and Others (5587/08) [2008] ZAKZHC 94 (12 December 2008)

Smith v Smith and Others (5587/08) [2008] ZAKZHC 94 (12 December 2008)

The court found that the applicant did not formally consent to arbitration and was not bound by the Fund's rules simply by lodging a claim and accepting payment. The definition of 'beneficiary' in the Fund's rules requires entitlement, which is disputed in this case. Since the applicant's status as a beneficiary is contested, she cannot be deemed bound by the arbitration provisions. The arbitration is between the first respondent and the Fund, both of whom admit to being bound by the rules. The applicant is not a party to the arbitration and is not bound by any award made therein. The court exercised its discretion to grant the declaratory relief sought by the applicant, declaring that...

Citation
[2008] ZAKZHC 94
Parties
Applicant: Heather Wendy Smith; Respondent: Jeremy Alan Smith; Respondent: Transnet Retirement Fund; Respondent: Advocate Jean Marais SC N.O.
Court
High Courts - Kwazulu Natal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 December 2008
Case Number
5587/08
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Application / Judgment
Outcome
Declaratory relief granted in favour of the applicant; she is not bound by any arbitration award made between the first respondent and the Fund.
Judges
Luthuli
Legal Topics
Declaratory Relief, Pension Fund Disputes, Arbitration Agreement, Beneficiary Entitlement
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Declaratory Relief Pension Fund Disputes Arbitration Agreement Beneficiary Entitlement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Heather Wendy Smith

Applicant

Jeremy Alan Smith

Respondent

Transnet Retirement Fund

Respondent

Advocate Jean Marais SC N.O.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Declaratory Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the dispute regarding the applicant's entitlement to death benefits and the quantum thereof is subject to mandatory arbitration under rule 15 of the Fund's rules.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is bound by any arbitration award made between the first respondent and the Fund.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is a beneficiary and thus bound by the Fund's rules and arbitration provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant did not formally consent to arbitration and was not bound by the Fund's rules simply by lodging a claim and accepting payment. The definition of 'beneficiary' in the Fund's rules requires entitlement, which is disputed in this case. Since the applicant's status as a beneficiary is contested, she cannot be deemed bound by the arbitration provisions. The arbitration is between the first respondent and the Fund, both of whom admit to being bound by the rules. The applicant is not a party to the arbitration and is not bound by any award made therein. The court exercised its discretion to grant the declaratory relief sought by the applicant, declaring that...

Court Disposition

Declaratory relief granted in favour of the applicant; she is not bound by any arbitration award made between the first respondent and the Fund.

Orders

  • An order is made in terms of paragraph 3 of the Notice of Motion, declaring that the applicant is not bound by any award that the arbitrator may make.
  • The first respondent is to pay the costs of the application, including the costs of two counsel.