Social Justice Coalition and Others v Minister of Police and Others (EC03/2016) [2018] ZAWCHC 181; 2019 (4) SA 82 (WCC) (14 December 2018)
The Court found that the system used by the South African Police Service to allocate human resources in the Western Cape, specifically the THRR policy, results in indirect and systemic discrimination against Black and poor communities. Statistical evidence demonstrated that police stations serving these communities have the lowest police-to-population ratios and the highest rates of violent crime, while wealthier, predominantly White areas are better resourced. The discrimination is not justified by operational needs or budgetary constraints, and the respondents failed to discharge the burden of proving that the discrimination was fair. The Court held that poverty qualifies as an unlisted...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAWCHC 181
- Parties
- Applicant: Social Justice Coalition; Applicant: Equal Education; Applicant: Nyanga Community Policing Forum; Respondent: Minister of Police; Respondent: National Commissioner of Police; Respondent: Western Cape Police Commissioner; Respondent: Minister for Community Safety, Western Cape
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2018
- Case Number
- EC03/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment on Unfair Discrimination; Remedy Postponed
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; declaration of unfair discrimination; hearing on remedy postponed.
- Judges
- Dolamo, Boqwana
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Discrimination, Equality Act, Allocation of State Resources, Indirect Discrimination, Intersectional Discrimination, Police Services
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Social Justice Coalition
Applicant
Equal Education
Applicant
Nyanga Community Policing Forum
Applicant
Minister of Police
Respondent
National Commissioner of Police
Respondent
Western Cape Police Commissioner
Respondent
Minister for Community Safety, Western Cape
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment on Unfair Discrimination; Remedy Postponed
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the allocation of police human resources in the Western Cape unfairly discriminate against Black and poor people on the basis of race and poverty.
- 2 Does the system employed by the South African Police Service to determine the allocation of police human resources constitute indirect discrimination on prohibited grounds.
- 3 Is poverty an unlisted ground of discrimination under the Equality Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the system used by the South African Police Service to allocate human resources in the Western Cape, specifically the THRR policy, results in indirect and systemic discrimination against Black and poor communities. Statistical evidence demonstrated that police stations serving these communities have the lowest police-to-population ratios and the highest rates of violent crime, while wealthier, predominantly White areas are better resourced. The discrimination is not justified by operational needs or budgetary constraints, and the respondents failed to discharge the burden of proving that the discrimination was fair. The Court held that poverty qualifies as an unlisted...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; declaration of unfair discrimination; hearing on remedy postponed.
Orders
- It is declared that the allocation of Police Human Resources in the Western Cape unfairly discriminates against Black and poor people on the basis of race and poverty.
- It is declared that the system employed by the South African Police Service to determine the allocation of Police Human Resources, in so far as it has been shown to be the case in the Western Cape Province, unfairly discriminates against Black and poor people on the basis of race and poverty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment