Sokomani and Others v African National Congress and Others (EL531/2020) [2023] ZAECELLC 2 (3 February 2023)
The court found that the rule nisi was framed too broadly, covering all ANC branch meetings in the region, while the applicants were only members of specific wards. The internal ANC appeal processes had been completed, and the regional conference had already taken place, rendering the issues moot. There was no live controversy remaining between the parties, and confirming the rule would have no practical effect. The court held that, as a court of first instance, it had no discretion to decide moot issues in the interests of justice or public importance. The applicants failed to establish a basis for confirming the rule in respect of either the branch meeting irregularities or the...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAECELLC 2
- Parties
- Applicant: Ondela Sokomani; Applicant: Anelisa Songqumase; Applicant: Fundiswa Sizani; Applicant: Lusapho Coto; Applicant: Xolani Lobese; Respondent: African National Congress; Respondent: National Executive Committee; Respondent: Eastern Cape Provincial Task Team (ANC); Respondent: Dr WB Rubusana Regional Task Team (ANC)
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, East London Local Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 2023
- Case Number
- EL531/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Return Day for Confirmation of Rule Nisi
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; rule nisi discharged.
- Judges
- Govindjee
- Legal Topics
- Political Party Internal Governance, Mootness, Declaratory Relief, Branch Meeting Irregularities, Exhaustion of Internal Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ondela Sokomani
Applicant
Anelisa Songqumase
Applicant
Fundiswa Sizani
Applicant
Lusapho Coto
Applicant
Xolani Lobese
Applicant
African National Congress
Respondent
National Executive Committee
Respondent
Eastern Cape Provincial Task Team (ANC)
Respondent
Dr WB Rubusana Regional Task Team (ANC)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Return Day for Confirmation of Rule Nisi
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the rule nisi interdicting the ANC regional conference and declaring branch meetings unconstitutional and unlawful should be confirmed.
- 2 Whether the matter is moot due to the conclusion of internal ANC appeal processes and the subsequent convening of the conference.
- 3 Whether a costs order should be made against the applicants given the constitutional nature of the dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the rule nisi was framed too broadly, covering all ANC branch meetings in the region, while the applicants were only members of specific wards. The internal ANC appeal processes had been completed, and the regional conference had already taken place, rendering the issues moot. There was no live controversy remaining between the parties, and confirming the rule would have no practical effect. The court held that, as a court of first instance, it had no discretion to decide moot issues in the interests of justice or public importance. The applicants failed to establish a basis for confirming the rule in respect of either the branch meeting irregularities or the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; rule nisi discharged.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Each party is to pay its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment